A TOP European economist has said it would be “inconceivable” for the EU to reject an independent Scotland’s membership.
Fabian Zuleeg, who is the chief executive and economist of the European Policy Centre, also said it “could ease some of the frictions and unresolved issues” the rest of the UK will be left with after Brexit if an independent Scotland rejoins.
Writing for thenational.scot he said: “If an independent Scotland shows its commitment to EU values, willing to fulfil the conditions of membership, it is inconceivable that it would be blocked permanently from becoming a member state.”
He went on: “It would be important for the EU to be convinced that an independent Scotland was not driven by a negative nationalism of “us vs them” but that it could even provide a bridge between the EU and the rest of the UK, helping to ease some of the frictions and unresolved issues.”
But Zuleeg warned the process would not be automatic but that Brexit has changed the case for Scotland in the EU compared to after the 2014 independence referendum.
“Then, a vote for independence would potentially have meant an exit from the EU, followed by an uncertain accession process, facing not only some sceptical member states struggling with secessionist movements but also the potential veto of the rest of the UK,” he said.
READ MORE: It's inconceivable that EU would block an independent Scotland from joining
“Now, EU countries recognise that Scotland has been taken out of the EU against its will and that there could well be a legitimate case to re-enter the EU.”
He said an independent Scotland would have to prove it “truly belongs in the EU” by pursuing a membership for reasons other than to achieve independence.
“The last thing the EU would want at this stage is a new ‘awkward’ partner,” Zuleeg continued. “Key here is a strong and visible commitment to EU values and the rule of law, in step with the overall direction of European integration.”
Zuleeg warned against pursuing alternative routes to independence instead of waiting for Westminster’s permission saying it “would create a dangerous political and legal precedent” in the eyes of EU member states. He said it “could stir up secessionist movements”.
Zuleeg concluded: “If constitutionally separated from the UK, and willing to commit to EU values and accession conditions, it is highly likely that an independent Scotland would become a member of the European Union.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel