CUTTING tax on Scotch Whisky and other spirits in the Budget could give Chancellor Rishi Sunak an extra £750 million to spend over the next three years, according to an analysis of alcohol taxation.
The figures, based on modelling conducted by the Centre for Economic and Business Research, show that the Treasury can generate an additional £748m in duty and VAT over a three-year period by cutting excise duty on spirits by 5%.
The new figures have been released as the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) presents its submission to the Chancellor ahead of the March 3 budget.
The SWA say that a reduction of the significant tax burden on Scotch Whisky, which currently sees £3 in every £4 spent on the average-priced bottle of Scotch Whisky go directly to the Treasury in taxes, would actually drive government revenues, boost the hospitality industry – which has been one of the worst impacted by Covid-19 – and lift the nation’s spirits after a challenging year for industry and consumers.
Burns Night: Whisky, gifts and treats for a lockdown celebration to remember
Currently, Scotch Whisky and other spirits are taxed more per unit of alcohol than beer, wine or cider. The 5% cut in duty proposed by the SWA would mean that Scotch Whisky would be taxed the same per unit as 11%abv wine.
The industry has also stressed to the Chancellor the need to support them in the face of punitive tariffs imposed by the United States on exports of Scotch Whisky. These tariffs have cost the industry £450m over the last 15 months, and losses continue to rise.
That Scotch Whisky is paying the price of a trade dispute between US and European aircraft manufacturers is creating real pressure on jobs and businesses and has compounded the losses the industry has also faced because of the global pandemic.
Sunak is being encouraged now to go much further than the freeze on duty that he announced in the last UK budget.
Karen Betts, SWA chief executive, said: “The last year has been very challenging for the Scotch Whisky industry, with the combined impact of Covid-19 and US tariffs. Scotch Whisky producers, large and small, are facing considerable losses and, as a result, we are urging the Chancellor to cut spirits duty in the Budget.
“A cut in duty will also help the hospitality sector, with pubs, bars and restaurants across the UK crying out for continued support.
READ MORE: Take a look inside the new Johnnie Walker whisky experience in Edinburgh
“The industry is not going cap in hand to the Chancellor – but in order that we can be a partner in recovery the Chancellor must use the tax system to help grow the economy.
“A cut in spirits duty will deliver additional revenue for the Government as well as supporting our industry as we absorb millions of pounds of losses as a result of UK Government subsidies to aerospace, which sparked the trade dispute that has seen 25% tariffs on exports of Scotch Whisky to the United States.
“With £450m in losses to date, and counting, jobs and businesses are now at risk, in Scotland and throughout our UK supply chain. The industry needs a package of support from the UK Government while distillers continue to face crippling tariffs, and the Chancellor can start by cutting duty in the budget.”
The Cebr analysis was carried out in late August and September 2020 and does not take account of recent Covid developments and related economic data.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here