TWELVE months ago, had the government at Westminster forecast that it would do all it could to protect us from Covid-19 and to protect the NHS, but that by January 2021 the victims of the pandemic would reach 100000-plus, and that after the outlay of billions of pounds (totals we shall never discover!) the death rate would continue to rise, it would not have survived the inevitable, justifiable censure of the House.
While the Tory party is directly responsible for the unacceptable state of the anti-Covid campaign, there is no escape from the fact that the system of governing Britain cannot be maintained.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson 'capsized the boat and now wants praise for the life rafts'
The Prime Minister confesses to being fully responsible for the state of the danger we are now in. He and his principal lieutenants – Sunak, Hancock, Patel, Rees-Mogg and Gove – are simply, regrettably, not up to the standard of competence required.
Due to our parliamentary “system”, a product of centuries of blundering through with no “written” constitution to fall back upon, we are likely to be victims of that ideology-driven incompetence until its chief architect has had enough. He will either run his full term or, if he has his way, will choose the most opportune time for his party’s interest.
Is it really difficult to conclude that the current Westminster system, evolved but not designed, is not fit for purpose? That purpose is the administration best suited to the needs of the “people” – not those of one particular party, supported as it is now by some 900 unelected, party-chosen peers, a body unique in the 21st century to Britain.
It would be acceptable if it was efficient. It is not.
John Hamilton
Bearsden
IN relation to the world, the UK population is approximately 1/118. In relation to Covid-19 deaths the UK has a relation of approximately 1/20. In relation to good governance Boris Johnson is a 100% failure.
M Ross
Aviemore
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here