OF all the things musicians would rate amongst their ambitions when setting out at the start of their career, success in Europe would be close to the top. A continent with a diverse musical taste, loyal fans, an almost inexplicable musical curiosity – Europe is on our doorstep but can almost seem like another world.
The enriching cultural experience of just actually being there, the excitement of performing in an array of wonderful destinations, sharing a musical exchange with people desperate to know where the music comes from and what informs it. Touring Europe is the epitome of what being in a band is all about.
I was lucky. Runrig had amazing success in Germany, Scandinavia and didn’t do too badly across the rest of the continent. We played the big festivals, appeared on their TV and I loved every crazy minute of it.
This is now to be deprived to future generations of musicians, with Brexit hurdles placed high to make the enterprise next to insurmountable.
Never properly considered in any of the discussions, texts or considerations, our artists and music industry have ended up as mere collateral in the tragedy that is the ending of freedom of movement. Music is a border-free proposition. Bands are multinational and music doesn’t care which country it is in. It is almost the exact opposite of Brexit. Leaving the EU and ending freedom of movement was therefore always going to be a disaster for our artists and musicians.
READ MORE: UK's musicians treated like 'pawns on a chessboard' in Brexit talks, SNP say
Like the rest of us, musicians will now only be allowed to spend 90 days out of 180 in the EU. A European tour could involve playing in anything up to 20 countries, with their own developed live scene and each with their own demands in transport and organisation. Bands tour because of the costs of assembling crews, transport and organisational infrastructure. I remember at the height of our success, sometimes we would be on the road for about half the year, mainly in Europe. Ninety days could be over before the setlist is properly bedded in.
Musicians will also have new Brexit border arrangements to negotiate, and this will increase red tape and costs. At the borders the carnet will need to be stamped. A band’s carnet is a record of all the equipment brought from the UK. It will now be designed to demonstrate that nothing is being imported into the single market illegally and nothing is being exported. Every border in the EU now has the right to examine and question the carnet, and if every country decided to do so it would place an unacceptable burden on drivers, tour managers and technicians.
Then there is all the new Brexit taxation and fiscal measures. There will be new arrangements for national insurances on top of income tax. There will also be the requirement to register for VAT in EU countries. This will mean more accountancy bills, more hours spent on paperwork, and more costs overall. Where touring is the prime generator of income for most artists, there is one feature of touring that often makes the difference between profitability and break-even: merchandise. All the new EU rules could make that margin even more precarious. Profitability from merchandise could dramatically reduce – again, more barriers, more burdens, and more costs.
Then we come to the visas. This is the killer, and the one that could make it simply just not worth it. First thing to note is that the Government assured the music industry that it would secure an arrangement that would ensure visa-free travel. Former minister Nigel Adams said explicitly that “visa rules for artists would not change”. This is what makes this seem like a total betrayal.
Where some countries like France have said that they will continue to allow visa free travel for artists, most have said they will not. If we generously assume that the cost of a visa will come in at around £300 per person, a modest travelling touring outfit of five band members, three crew, one sound engineer, a tour manager and a driver will mean additional costs of £3000, and that is for just for one country. This will be doubled, trebled, increased tenfold dependent on how many countries are included on the tour. Medium-sized and larger enterprises with their array of lightning technicians, set designers, PA crews, caterers and accountants could face costs of £10,000 before a sound check has even been done. For bands operating at extreme margins, the EU will be more or less closed.
The music industry is the UK’s cultural jewel in the crown. It is worth some £5.2 billion to the economy and we are second only to the US in worldwide reach and impact. It provides immense soft power for the UK. It is something we do spectacularly well which makes the UK Government’s lackadaisical indifference even more bizarre.
For this Government, it is all about their obsession with ending freedom of movement. Nothing is more important than that mission, and if live music falls foul of that objective then it seems it will just have to suck it up. For all the ridiculous EU blaming the hapless minister deployed to answer my Urgent Question last week, more or less conceded that “the people must have what they voted for” and the offer the EU made to allow visa free travel for 90 days was rejected because it might just “open the door”.
What the Government didn’t count on was the backlash. Some 280,000 have now signed the petition organised by our artists, set to be debated in Parliament on February 8. The letter reinforced the strong feeling right across the industry.
The UK Government versus our musicians and artists is not a good place for this government to be in – everyone just wants this to be fixed. The EU made a realistic offer and that is still on the table. The Government claims the “door is still open”, so let’s walk through that door, sit down, negotiate, and sort this out.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here