THE Scottish Conservatives have been plunged into an internal feud after Ruth Davidson blocked a former Tory MP from running for Holyrood, according to reports in the Press and Journal.
Colin Clark, who was the Westminster representative for Gordon from 2017 to 2019 having won the seat from Alex Salmond, had applied to run for a place in the Scottish Parliament in May.
However, his application was rejected by Davidson’s candidate committee.
The committee said Clark had “a poor record working with others”. One source told the Press and Journal: “In just two years, [Clark] managed to fall out with most of the party.”
READ MORE: Ruth Club: Ex-leader to give 'special endorsement' to selected Tory candidates
The former MP said he was “absolutely stunned” to have been turned down, as he had been encouraged to put his name forward by Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross, among other high-ranking colleagues.
Clark said the committee’s decision seemed “very personal and very political”, and suggested it may have been because of his support for both Brexit and Boris Johnson.
He went on: “Douglas Ross, when he became leader, suggested I stand for Holyrood. Douglas has a difficult job to do and this argument is simply not necessary.
“Unionists should not be disunited going into the election. Disagreements about Boris Johnson and Brexit should be in the past.”
The committee also reportedly cited a “lack of campaigning” on Clark’s part as a reason for his rejection.
The Tory, who formerly served as a parliamentary under-secretary for Scotland, said the claim was “inaccurate”.
He said: “Having been a minister in Boris Johnson’s Government, a senior whip, fought in six elections in four years, worked tirelessly to promote Gordon and increased the Conservative vote in 2019, I believed I had earned my party’s support.
“I had hoped to serve the north east at Holyrood but a committee of four deemed I was not suitable and without recourse.”
However, a Scottish Tory source told the Press and Journal that Clark had only boosted the party vote in Gordon due to the success of Davidson at Holyrood.
They said: “Colin was elected on the back of Ruth Davidson’s impact and the Scottish Conservatives' clear message to stop another divisive referendum.
“As most people would acknowledge, Colin was not a good campaigner. In just two years, he managed to fall out with most of the party.
READ MORE: Angus Robertson: Tories like Michael Gove play politics with coronavirus
“Ruth was tasked with creating a Scottish Conservative team ready to take the fight to the nationalists and stop their push for indyref2 this year.”
The committee was announced in December of last year. It was tasked with agreeing those to be ranked on the Holyrood lists and "give special endorsement to especially qualified candidates".
Speaking then, Davidson said: "Irrespective of age, job, gender or ethnicity, we want talented people prepared to work hard in the service of their local community and I am determined to ensure that the team under Douglas Ross after May is the strongest Conservative team ever elected to Holyrood."
That team will not include Davidson, as she will be stepping down from her role as an MSP in order to join the House of Lords.
A Scottish Tory spokesperson said they would not comment on internal party selection processes.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel