KEIR Starmer is beginning to worry me. Take his performance today. He has done two things, each of which is wrong in itself.
First, he has apparently told his MPs to not talk about Brexit. And then he refused to condemn Matt Hancock MP, the UK Health Secretary, for having been found to have broken the law last week when given the opportunity to do so by Sophy Ridge on Sky.
Speechless.pic.twitter.com/ZozSwRmyTr
— Tory Fibs (@ToryFibs) February 21, 2021
Why are these issues worrying? Because both reveal that Starmer will not do the job required of the Leader of the Opposition, which is to hold the Government to account.
On Brexit, around half of the electorate in the UK as a whole still believes Brexit was a mistake. Scotland is lucky to have electable politicians willing to say so. But within the first-past-the-post system at Westminster Starmer is, by refusing to discuss this issue, choosing to deny half the electorate of England and Wales the opportunity to express their real opinions.
As importantly, this fact, when combined with Labour’s tribalism and its opposition to proportional representation, means that he has every intention of continuing to deny this right to decide.
READ MORE: Conservative ‘corruption’ puts UK politics at a major turning point, SNP MP says
In the process, by choosing to ignore Tory failings on Brexit he basically suggests that they have got things right. In that case, he effectively suggests that he has nothing to say, and so guarantees that the Tories will go on winning election after election. No Leader of the Opposition should make that their aim, but Starmer appears to do so.
If this is bad, then his failure to demand Matt Hancock’s resignation is worse. Last week a Judicial Review in the English Courts ruled that Hancock had broken the law by refusing to publish on time many of the contracts issued for PPE required for NHS and other staff tackling coronavirus. There are still contracts not published. There are still, as a result, doubts about the legality of many of the contracts in question. Doubts about cronyism have also been raised, time and again. And on top of all this NHS staff did not and still do not have the PPE that they need. And yet, despite all that Starmer quite explicitly said that he did not think Hancock should resign.
Hancock is one of the minsters responsible for tens of thousands of excess Covid deaths in the UK. Some of these deaths arose because of inadequate PPE. Many of those who have died have been health and care workers and in almost every one of their cases, PPE may have been an issue.
We now know that Hancock acted unlawfully with regard to the contacts for the purchase of PPE. And yet Starmer says he should stay.
READ MORE: Matt Hancock refuses to resign over unlawful ruling on Covid contracts
Not only is this Starmer not doing his job properly, it means he is turning a blind eye to law-breaking. In the process, he appears to be ignoring the corruption that this non-disclosure might have hidden. For a lawyer, as Starmer is, to do that is staggering.
So what does this say to Scotland?
First, thank goodness it has a wider choice of political parties and can choose to ignore Labour if it wishes. Second, Scotland should be grateful for the proportional representation that it has got. Third, the encouragement of a diversity of views that PR delivers is vital and must continue after independence. Fourth, the rule of law is vital in politics: Scotland will be very aware of this during the coming weeks.
But most of all, what this says is that Scotland should turn its back on the failed Westminster parliamentary system that has nothing to offer it any more. It’s not just Johnson who makes that case; Starmer does too.
Richard Murphy is a chartered accountant, director of Tax Research LLP and Visiting Professor of Accounting at the University of Sheffield.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel