A CONSTITUTION expert has warned that the greatest threat to the integrity of the United Kingdom is Unionism.
Professor Michael Keating, the chair of Scottish politics at the University of Aberdeen, told BBC Radio Scotland's The Sunday Show that the idea of Unionism is being made into one overarching idea of British Unionism, which never existed before devolution.
He noted that ideas of Unionism in Scotland and Northern Ireland were different to each other and before devolution these were given a great deal of recognition.
He said: "From 1999 the Unionist parties conceded devolution, but on the other hand they seem to have lost that sense of the Union being different things. Now that the Union is under pressure, they are trying to reinvent Unionism as something it never really was, namely a single thing right across all the nations of the United Kingdom and they just don’t fit together.
"These Unions are very different things because these Unions are very different in nature so it’s becoming rather forced. Unionism then - rather than being an umbrella within which these various national identities could co-exist and co-operate - has become a bit of a national identity itself with all this stuff about the Britishness debate and British values."
READ MORE: Scotland Office fought for years to hide secret papers on devolution referendum
This difference in Unionism approaches can be seen in the UK Government having to be neutral in regards to Northern Ireland but taking an active role in promoting the Union in Scotland.
Keating said the idea of teaching "British values" to children in school, which the UK Government identifies as "democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and mutual respect and tolerance for those of different faiths and beliefs" are not mutually exclusive to Brits, with the SNP and other independence parties subscribing to the same beliefs.
He said: "Everybody believes in these values, there is no reason to attach that particularly to be British as opposed to being Scottish or Irish or Welsh or English for that matter."
A "more encompassing Unionism" would accept that there are people in Scotland who want to be independent, according to Keating who says they should be accommodated in the constitution, as they are in Northern Ireland.
He continued: "The Northern Ireland Agreement of course explicitly allowed for this, it said there are nationalists and Unionists, they have different long-term ambitions and that's fine, that's not a problem, we've just got to live with this rather than saying you must abandon your long-term aspirations because there's only one way to be a Unionist.
"Unionism never did that in the past. It's doing that now because it feels under threat, for good reasons with the rise in support for Scottish independence and Irish unification. It is becoming very defensive rather than being more relaxed in the way it was in the past, realising there are many different ways to belong in the Union.
"I like to compare it with the European Union which doesn't mean that you can't be French or German or Dutch, there are different meanings for the EU, we don't have to share the same understanding of what it's all about because we would never agree."
READ MORE: Conservative ‘corruption’ puts UK politics at major turning point, SNP MP says
He then went onto say that the idea of federalism in the UK is not likely to work as England would have to be included in a federal UK and the people there are "just not interested in federalism".
He said a "federal understanding" might work, whereby Westminster has no power to legislate in devolved areas, as they currently do.
However, while Keating said the Unionists have lost the arguments, that does not mean that nationalists have won as he cited the complications Scottish independence faces from Brexit creating a hard border and around currency.
Keating thinks that a conversation needs to be had around "rethinking Westminster sovereignty" where the central UK Government respects the decisions of devolved governments and not intervene in devolved matters.
He said: "There also needs to be a rethink of intergovernmental relations. Every few years the UK Government wakes up to the reality of devolution. It's not that the UK wants to do down Scotland most of the time, it just forgets that Scotland and Wales are there."
Rethinking this constitutional arrangement, Keating says, would create "greater clarity" around which government has responsibility for different policies.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel