OVER the weekend we have learned that several prominent DUP politicians will join a legal action against the Northern Ireland protocol of the EU-UK Brexit Withdrawal Agreement.
This move is to compliment the political campaign already underway, a campaign that bluntly seeks to remove the protocol from the Agreement. It must be said, again, that no tangible or workable solutions have been presented to replace this.
We have seen recent attempts to rehash the already dismissed Alternative Arrangements, but these are not solutions. A lot of work was done over several years on the impacts of Brexit on the island of Ireland, it’s not even two months since the protocol came into effect. There is no magic alternative.
Nobody likes the protocol, but it is a compromise solution reflecting the political will of the British Government that can work. It’s impact is clearly being overstated for political gain by some, as industry leaders have been much clearer on the actual impact and possible solutions.
READ MORE: DUP to challenge legality of Boris Johnson's Brexit deal in court
One of the big concerns for the Irish Government through the original Brexit Referendum campaign was that little attention was given in England to the impact Brexit could have on the situation in Ireland. These concerns were either ignored or dismissed by the Leave campaign.
This legal challenge is not a surprising turn of events although it is ill-judged and will only further entrench the febrile political environment, as well as creating further uncertainty for people and businesses in Northern Ireland.
Alongside DUP politicians, the other parties to this case include former Brexit Party MEP Ben Habib (below), Labour peer Kate Hoey and Traditional Unionist Voice leader Jim Allister. These three individuals are a collection of some of the hardest Brexiteers that have been prominent over recent years.
Habib has repeatedly made a fool of himself with his assertions about the situation in Ireland while Antrim-born Baroness Hoey has said the Good Friday Agreement is not a sustainable solution. An extreme Loyalist, Allister has consistently been a vehement opponent of the Good Friday Agreement.
There will be few with sympathy for the argument that the protocol, which prevents a hard border in Ireland and guarantees dual market access for local businesses, breaches the Good Friday Agreement, particularly when nearly all those bringing this challenge opposed the Agreement originally. The calls of delivering democracy will ring hollow in a Northern Ireland that, like Scotland, voted against Brexit in the first place.
READ MORE: How is the UK triggering article 16 a solution to the EU doing the same thing?
The DUP’s stance on the protocol is disappointing if not surprising, the party were enthusiastic supporters of Brexit and indeed had the opportunity to shape the negotiations and solutions when they held the balance of power in Westminster from 2017 to 2019.
In the interests of doing something productive, perhaps it is time for the party to dial down the rhetoric and work towards a practical resolution to any difficulties within the structure of the Withdrawal Agreement which followed Brexit. Both the EU and the British Government are committed to finding solutions where they are possible.
This type of politics is no good for anyone in my opinion. We all have an obligation to dial it down, to come together to discuss these questions. As public representatives we must put politics aside and deal with the issues within an economic, social and practical context.
Unionists in Northern Ireland have many legitimate concerns that should not be dismissed. However, none of these concerns will be sated by a pointless legal action destined to fail.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel