NICOLA Sturgeon has scolded Ruth Davidson over her House of Lords peerage in a heated exchange at Holyrood.
The First Minister’s democratic credentials were called into question by the Scottish Tory Holyrood leader, who attacked the Government over its handling of complaints against Alex Salmond.
Davidson told MSPs: “This sorry affair isn’t just tarnishing the First Minister’s own reputation, it is damaging the institutions that it is her responsibility to uphold.
“Majority votes by members of this chamber to produce legal advice – ignored. Crucial evidence – freely available elsewhere – censored. Promises of openness and transparency – broken.”
She added: "The reputation of this Scottish government – tainted. The standing of this parliament – diminished."
READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: The Salmond vs Sturgeon battle is lose-lose ... but the party can be fixed
Sturgeon hit back, noting that Davidson is set to take a seat in the House of Lords.
She replied: “Ruth Davidson wants to lecture the rest of us about democratic integrity. But that’s the same Ruth Davidson who’s about to depart this elected institution, dodge an election, take a seat in the unelected House of Lords, where she will pursue a political career at the taxpayers’ expense, but never have to ask voters for their permission ever again.
“I don't think Ruth Davidson is in the position to lecture anyone about democracy.”
READ MORE: Independence supported by majority of Scots, 22nd consecutive poll shows
The former Scottish Tory chief was nominated for a peerage by Boris Johnson last summer.
She is set to stand down as an MSP at the Holyrood election in May before taking her place in the Lords.
The Scottish Tories responded to the First Minister on social media after the clash with Davidson in Parliament.
MSP Annie Wells tweeted: “You have to laugh at Sturgeon's brass neck when she mentions the ‘taxpayer's expense’ when her government's flawed investigation into Salmond cost over half a MILLION pounds of public money. Never forget.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel