BORIS Johnson “can’t believe his luck” over the feud between Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon, Henry McLeish has said.
The former Labour first minister made the intervention as he appealed for a line to be drawn soon under the “unprecedented row” and certainly before the Holyrood election in May.
“Boris Johnson can’t believe his luck. The Covid vaccination success has boosted him in the polls and this row is boosting him as from afar it looks like Scotland is in a political mess. Johnson will make hay while this is happening,” McLeish told The National.
“It couldn’t have come at a worse time. He is trying to dislocate activities in Scotland, he is trying to undermine devolution, he’s been talking about reviewing the Barnett formula [which determines the size of the Scottish Government’s block grant from Westminster] and create the impression that Scotland is out of line and the old version of the Union is in the best position.”
READ MORE: Unionist journalist says Boris Johnson’s lying is a threat to politics
Two inquiries are ongoing, one a Holyrood probe into what went wrong in the Scottish Government’s investigation into complaints made against Salmond when he was first minister. It was found by a court to have been unlawful, unfair and “tainted by apparent bias”.
A second inquiry is being conducted by James Hamilton QC into whether the First Minister broke the Ministerial Code, regarded as a resignation matter. McLeish, who was first minister from 2000 to 2001 and resigned over an office expenses issue, said he wanted to see the situation resolved soon.
“We have an election coming up in May. The two inquiries have got to be concluded as soon as possible, one way or the other. I certainly wouldn’t want these inquiries to be extended beyond the election. I don’t think that would be fair on anybody.”
He also appealed for calm and said politicians should allow the inquiries to conclude before drawing conclusions. “As a former first minister, and there are not many of us around, I am asking people to look upon this with some perspective.
READ MORE: Jim Sillars writes directly to Nicola Sturgeon over alleged code breach
“Across the board we are jumping to conclusions. We need to step back from the brink and let due process carry without deepening this crisis.
“I have never seen anything like this in Scottish politics before. There is a party which seems to be tearing itself apart in full public view.”
Salmond launched a scathing attack on the Scottish Government in his opening statement to the inquiry last Friday.
“Scotland has not failed, its leadership has failed,” he said in his opening remarks to MSPs.
During six hours of questioning he repeatedly accused Sturgeon of breaching the Ministerial Code of conduct and has alleged that figures including Peter Murrell, the chief executive of the SNP and husband of the First Minister, and three other senior figures close to Sturgeon of a “deliberate, prolonged, malicious and concerted effort” to damage his reputation and have him jailed.
In turn, the First Minister, who gives evidence to the committee this Wednesday, has accused Salmond of pushing “wild” conspiracy theories and putting forward “an alternative reality”. She has denied breaching the Ministerial Code.
READ MORE: Ruth Wishart: Scottish independence supporters deserve better than this political soap opera
In January, McLeish, who wants to see a federal UK, condemned Johnson’s lockdown visit to Scotland, saying the Prime Minister had “lost the plot” over the Union and had no idea how to save the UK from collapse.
At the time polls had suggested growing support for independence.
However, a poll published yesterday which was carried out on Thursday after Salmond’s dramatic written evidence to the committee was made public, but before his marathon appearance before MSPs on Friday showed a 50-50 split for and against independence.
It was the first of more than 20 opinion polls not to record a majority for Yes – raising fears among independence supporters that the ongoing feud is having a damaging impact.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel