THE Prime Minister has claimed that the SNP’s plans to hold a second Scottish independence referendum are “uncalled for and unnecessary”.
He also seemed to rule out a referendum “anytime in the foreseeable future”, saying he thought it would be inappropriate given the Covid pandemic.
The SNP accused the Prime Minister of continuing with his "Trump-like denial of democracy".
In an interview with the Sun newspaper, Boris Johnson said Nicola Sturgeon asking for a Section 30 order would be “completely inapposite, irrelevant, uncalled for and unnecessary”.
Johnson said: “The idea of having a referendum now, is absolutely extraordinary, or having a referendum anytime in the foreseeable future, given what this country's just been through and what we've got to do.”
READ MORE: SNP demand to know how much failed Union Unit cost the taxpayer
The ongoing pandemic has seen support for independence become the sustained majority position in Scotland. A total of 22 consecutive polls from June 2020 to February 2021 suggested a Yes vote would win a referendum.
The most recent poll showed the nation split down the middle on the question once Don’t Knows were excluded. However, pro-independence parties are expected to command a dominant majority in Holyrood after the May elections, according to that same poll.
The Prime Minister insisted that the pandemic had actually strengthened the case for the Union.
He said: “The value of the Union has been massively underscored during this pandemic.
“I think most people looking at the way the UK has responded with the vaccine rollout can see the huge value of us working together as one United Kingdom.
"The UK armed forces and NHS distribution of the vaccine throughout one country has been fantastic.”
The Sun asked the Prime Minister about the dispute between Sturgeon and her predecessor, Alex Salmond.
Unlike his colleagues in Scotland, Johnson avoided criticising either of the SNP leaders on the issue. He said: “I think the biggest lesson I take from all this is that it's important in these times to focus on the issues that really matter to the people of Britain.
"The more I read about other stuff, the more convinced I am that that's what we should focus on.
"What the electorate in Scotland want is a government that focuses on their needs for education, fighting crime, governing sensibly with sensible policies on taxation and everything else.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross defends his own party's exclusion from Union strategy committee
“I don't see that from the Scottish National Party. I don’t see that at all and I'd rather hold them to account for that."
Ipsos MORI polling from last week found that the constitutional question was the most important issue for supporters of the three largest parties in Scotland.
Overall, 44% of voters said it was the biggest issue for them when deciding how to cast their vote, with Tory supporters the most likely to cite it in their reasoning.
Johnson, who created himself the Minister for the Union role after he became Prime Minister, is now also the chair of a Cabinet committee tasked with saving the Union.
The all-male panel has replaced the Union Unit as the head of Downing Street's strategy on holding the UK together.
An SNP spokesperson said: "The elections in May will be about Scotland's right to choose its own future. Do the people of Scotland want their future in the hands of the likes of Boris Johnson and the Tories or does Scotland want to put its future into its own hands.
"Boris Johnson cannot continue his Trump-like denial of democracy.
"It will be for the people of Scotland to decide their future - not Boris Johnson. The only way to do that and to hold a post-pandemic referendum is by giving both votes to the SNP in May."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel