NICOLA Sturgeon faces difficult questions at the Holyrood harassment inquiry today after two senior SNP figures questioned her account of meetings with Alex Salmond.
Former party strategist Kevin Pringle, and advocate Duncan Hamilton - a former MSP - have told the committee that the First Minister knew she was meeting Salmond in her house on April 2 to discuss the complaints against him.
She has previously said that the first she knew of the allegations and the investigation was when he told her at that meeting.
However, it later emerged that she met Geoff Aberdein, Salmond’s former chief of staff, in her office on March 29, 2018.
Sturgeon has since said that she had forgotten that meeting, that it was opportunistic and casual and that it “never held any significance” in her head.
Salmond had said this is untenable and that the meeting was formal, and explicitly set up to talk about the investigation.
Last Friday, he told the committee this could be backed up by Aberdein, Pringle and Hamilton. MSPs then wrote to the men asking for their recollections.
In his submission, Pringle writes: “Based on my contact with Mr Aberdein, I know he was clear that the purpose of the meeting on 29 March 2018 was to discuss the two complaints that had been made against Mr Salmond.”
Hamilton also confirmed this in his letter.
He said: "I spoke to Geoff Aberdein on 29 March 2018 after his meeting in the Scottish Parliament. At that time, he intimated that a further meeting would be arranged to discuss the complaints with the First Minister.
"That meeting was arranged for 2 April 2018. I was invited to that meeting and travelled to it along with Mr Salmond and Mr Aberdein.
"I would further note that the letter received from the Scottish Government was the sole focus of the meeting.
"Further, when we arrived, everyone in the room knew exactly why we were there. No introduction to the subject was needed and no one was in any doubt what we were there to discuss."
Hamilton also said the First Minister offered to intervene in the government’s investigation, something she has denied repeatedly.
He said: “I can confirm that the First Minister did offer to assist. We discussed mediation. My clear recollection is that her words were, ‘if it comes to it, I will intervene.”
He said he discussed the comment to intervene with Salmond and Aberdein after the meeting, as it was the most legally significant moment of the night.
Hamilton also backed up Salmond's claim that the identity of one of the female civil servants who accusing the ex-SNP leader of harassment was shared with Aberdein by a government official.
Last Thursday Sturgeon told MSPs: “To the very best of my knowledge, I do not think that that happened.”
Hamilton said: "I can also confirm that I was told the name of a complainant by Mr Aberdein (Mr Salmond’s former Chief of Staff) in the early part of March 2018.
"I cannot recall the precise date, but it was very shortly after the 7th March 2018, the date Mr Salmond received his letter.
"The name of the complainant had been given to Mr Aberdein by a senior government official."
This was supported by Pringle.
The First Minister is facing calls to resign, with the Tories set to table a motion of no confidence.
A spokesman for Sturgeon said: “The First Minister will address all of the issues raised – and much more besides – at the committee tomorrow, while the independent adviser on the ministerial code will report in due course. "
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel