THE former top civil servant in the Home Office has settled his employment tribunal claim against Priti Patel for a six-figure sum.
Sir Philip Rutnam, who served as the department's ex-permanent secretary, began proceedings against the Home Secretary last year after quitting his post in February.
He accused the Tory minister of a "vicious and orchestrated briefing campaign" against him.
Patel rejected all claims of bullying made against her.
The tribunal was due to take place in September, with all the allegations made public.
However, in a statement via the FDA Union on Thursday, Rutnam said the Government had decided to settle.
READ MORE: MPs hit out as Priti Patel 'missing' from lost police records meeting
He said: "I am pleased to say that the Government has today settled the claims that I brought against them and which were due to be heard in an employment tribunal in September.
"I have received excellent support during this process and I would like to express warm thanks to the FDA and to my legal team, Slater and Gordon and Gavin Mansfield QC.
"I also want to record my appreciation and thanks to the many individuals, known and unknown to me, who have expressed their support throughout.
"This settlement resolves my own case. The FDA is continuing to pursue in separate proceedings the wider issues that have been raised.
"I now look forward to the next stages of my career."
The UK Government said it "regrets the circumstances surrounding Sir Philip's resignation".
In a statement, it said: "Sir Philip Rutnam resigned from his post as permanent secretary of the Home Office on February 29, 2020, and subsequently began legal proceedings against the Home Office.
"Joining the civil service in 1987, Sir Philip is a distinguished public servant. During this period he held some of the most senior positions in the Civil Service including as permanent secretary of the Department for Transport and the Home Office.
"The then cabinet secretary wrote to Sir Philip when he resigned. This letter recognises his devoted public service and excellent contribution; the commitment and dedication with which he approached his senior leadership roles; and the way in which his conduct upheld the values inherent in public service.
"The Government regrets the circumstances surrounding Sir Philip's resignation. The Government and Sir Philip are now pleased that a settlement has been reached to these proceedings."
A Home Office spokesman said: "The Government and Sir Philip's representatives have jointly concluded that it is in both parties' best interests to reach a settlement at this stage rather than continuing to prepare for an employment tribunal.
"The Government does not accept liability in this matter and it was right that the Government defended the case."
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry slams Boris Johnson as adviser quits in Priti Patel row
The wider issues referred to by Rutnam includes the FDA's judicial review of Boris Johnson’s decision to overrule his own ethics adviser.
Sir Alex Allan resigned in November after the Prime Minister rejected the findings of his investigation into the allegations around Patel.
His report found that the Home Secretary’s frustration with staff “has manifested itself in forceful expression, including some occasions of shouting and swearing”, adding: “This may not be done intentionally to cause upset, but that has been the effect on some individuals.”
He said she may have unintentionally breached the ministerial code.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel