DOUGLAS Ross has said that his comments on gypsy travellers is one of his mistakes that have "come back to haunt" him.
The Scottish Tory leader, who is planning to return to Holyrood at Mayās election, made the comments in an online conversation with the Bright Blue thinktank today.Ā Ā
He said he "deeply regrets" the comment he made duringĀ a quick-fire Q&A he did for Core Politics shortly after being elected as an MP for Moray in 2017.
READ MORE:Ā SNP delete tweet slamming Douglas Ross for 'long history of racism'
Asked what heĀ would do if he was Prime Minister for a day, he had replied: āI would like to see tougher enforcement against Gypsy travellers."
The remark saw the 38-year-old accused of attacking an already persecuted minority.
š Douglas Ross is the new leader of the Scottish Tories.
ā The SNP (@theSNP) August 5, 2020
āIf you were Prime Minister for a day, without any repercussions, what would you do?ā
Douglas Ross: āIād like to see tougher enforcement against gypsy travellers.ā pic.twitter.com/HlWB9mCmIF
Ross told Bright Blue chief executive Ryan Shorthouse today:Ā āThere are a multiple of better, different answers I could have given than the one I gave about a local issue here about enforcement against gypsy travellers.
āThatās something that still comes up. It was on my Twitter feed the other day.
āI deeply regret my answer to that question and the way it was interpreted, and I said that at the time.
"It was a big local issue, it continues to be a big local issue here in Moray every summer. But itās never something I should have answered as my top priority if I had one day as Prime Minister.
āBut thatās just one example.
"Iāve said things, Iāve done things that if I had my time again I would have gone in a different direction, but we donāt have the benefit of hindsight in politics.
āWe have to be open and accept our mistakes and learn from them and move on.
āI think politicians who are willing to do that, who are willing to accept they made a mistake, they donāt try to bury bad news and paper over the cracks and hope no one notices, just be upfront and honest with people.Ā
āMy honesty has sometimes got me into trouble as well both with my party and for myself, but I think people just want honesty from politicians. You say what you think and youālll correct it and you wonāt do it again.ā
RossĀ was asked about whether there were mistakes in his political career which he looked back on with regret and wanted to share.
He said: āYes, loads. I mean, almost every week Iām thinking, āGod, could I have done that differently? Did I listen to this piece of advice? Should have I done that?ā
āWhen I was a minister you have to make decisions.
āI was a junior minister in theĀ ScotlandĀ Office, and youāre looking at things and thought, āCould I have done this better? Was that a mistake?ā
āI donāt think any politician should ever say they have never made a mistake.Ā
āIāve said things in speeches that Iāve gone to regret.Ā
āIāve answered quick fire questions that have come back to haunt me.Ā
āSo through out my political career there have been things I would have done differently.
āIād be pretty disappointed if you asked any politician that if they made mistakes and they said they hadnāt.ā
READ MORE:Ā Senior Tory MSPs 'not consulted' about plan for Nicola Sturgeon no-confidence vote
Asked whether the Scottish Conservatives might stop using the āSNP termā independence and switch to using āleaving the UKā instead, Mr Ross said: āI think thereās a point there.
āI tend to use the word separation, separating from the rest of the United Kingdom.
āBecause independence, the word itself, is quite a positive word.
āWhen youāre younger you want to become independent and move away from home and start off in life. When youāre older you want to remain independent as long as you can.
āI can understand why that word has more positive connotations than separation.
āBut I think whatever weāre speaking about, it is about ripping apart the United Kingdom, and that i what the SNP want to do and I want to stop it.ā
Ross, who voted Remain in the 2016 Brexit referendum, also admitted that the UK-EU trade deal signed by Boris Johnson was generating extra bureaucracy despite the Prime Minister claiming it meant there would be āno non-tariff barriers to tradeā.
Referring to the need for more financial aid for Scotlandās fishing industry, he said:Ā āCoastal communities and fishing communities need our support.Ā
āThe Brexit deal didnāt deliver for them in the way they had hoped, and there have been significant problems in terms of bureaucracy and added paperwork that continue to need to be resolved.
āUntil we can do that, then we will need to continue to support them, but Iām pretty sure the Chancellor is looking at how that support is being spent now and we might have to come back to this.
āBut I will keep challenging and fighting for the fishing communities in the north east of Scotland and other parts of the country.ā
he said there were people who had voted No in 2014 and Remain in 2016 who were now thinking of backing independence.
He said: āI think clearly getting a deal with the EU on Christmas Eve last year was positive for many of these people because they were worried about a No Deal Brexit.Ā They were reassured.
āI accept, for our exporters, there are too many delays still. There has been progress but itās still an issue. Thereās too much bureaucracy and weāve got to get to the bottom of that.
āItās not the fault of the fishermen or the exporters, it is the fault of the Government at the Scottish level because weāve had issues at Larkhall, with the [food export] hub, and at the UK level with the bureaucracy that was added in, and weāve got to resolve that.āĀ
But he claimedĀ Brexit had been a help in the rapid rollout of Covid vaccines and this weekās suspension of US tariffs from Scotch whisky and cashmere.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. Weāve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who arenāt really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So thatās why weāve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate ā and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about ā people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Letās get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel