WELL I expect you can hear the shrieks of outrage even behind your own closed doors? No? Me neither. It seems Douglas Ross, Ruth Davidson et al are just so very, very busy they can’t find a minute to complain about Boris Johnson misleading the House of Commons.
But it is so. Shocked as I know you must be that the Prime Minister was telling less than the unvarnished truth about the availability of his government’s Covid contracts for public scrutiny, it seems he has been retailing porkies.
I have it on no less an authority than a High Court order that there are still 100 of these very lucrative contracts yet to be unveiled. Five months after the legal deadline for publication we still await the details, although the PM stood up at the dispatch box and assured the nation that they were all already on record. Except that they’re not.
Everyone from the National Audit Office to the Good Law Project has been appalled at the cost of these contracts and the manner in which they were dished out, without anything resembling competitive tendering. Worse still there was a VIP fast lane for bidders, whose main claim to fame seems to be that they were either Tory donors, Tory pals or both of the above.
READ MORE: Court order shows 'Boris Johnson misled parliament over Covid-19 contracts'
Little Matt Hancock remains unrepentant. Not normal times. Great Urgency. Need for fast tracking. And all the other mealy mouthed alibis.
And you could just about buy some of that, were it not for two rather salient factors. One is the number of companies with proven track records in the field whose calls were mysteriously unreturned.
More damning was the nature of some of the successful suppliers – successful, that is, in gaining a fat contract, not to be confused with providing goods of sufficient and usable standard.
I mean however desperate you were to get instant access to decent PPE would you really want to be dealing with someone whose daily business was making pest control products? Or selling sweeties. Or who had just set up an instant company with no known experience in anything but spotting a fast buck?
READ MORE: Matt Hancock defends one per cent pay rise for nurses despite threat of strikes
Like so much that is tawdry in Johnson’s administration, this scandal has benefitted from all our minds being rather preoccupied with staying alive. The pandemic has also diverted attention from the onrushing car crash in Northern Ireland where the protocol agreed by the PM to protect the peace process is now the subject of a mugging by both his new – and recently ennobled – Brexit bovver boy, and the DUP, who have obviously burnt though all Mrs May’s bribe money and are cutting up rough.
You may just remember Mr Johnson assuring them there would be no such thing as a seabourne border between the UK and NI. You may recall watching him assure them that any pesky customs forms could be safely binned. You may have forgotten, as he clearly has, that the deal was the one signed off by his very self in order to “get Brexit done.”
So this is a PM with some form in the matter of misleading, which I believe is parliamentary language for telling lies.
Our own First Minister has been accused daily by the Scottish Tories of misleading Holyrood. A crime beyond redemption it seems, should the Hamilton inquiry find her guilty of same.
We will find out that verdict soon enough. But the judgement has already been passed in a court of law about Messrs Johnson and Hancock.
And from the leaders of their Scottish pack, nothing but silence. The deafening variety.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel