THE disappearance of Sarah Everard has prompted an online discussion about the different attitudes men and women have towards personal safety.
Human remains have been found and a male police officer is being held on suspicion of murder after Ms Everard, 33, vanished while walking home from a friend’s flat in south London on Wednesday, March 3.
The case has become national news followed by millions and, though its full details are not yet known, it has highlighted the danger women can face when out alone – and the measures they take to avoid it.
READ MORE: Sarah Everard: Tory Shaun Bailey slammed over 'grotesque' tweet
For some women, it has also been a troubling reminder of their own experiences.
“Sarah Everard did everything right. Everything women are ‘supposed’ to. Bright clothing. Main road. Called her man,” posted Twitter user @thelaurabird.
“Every woman I know in Clapham doesn’t feel safe at night. Not to walk home from work, to exercise, to walk to the shop. I wish more men understood this feeling.”
Sarah Everard did everything right. Everything women are 'supposed' to. Bright clothing. Main road. Called her man. Every woman I know in Clapham doesn't feel safe at night. Not to walk home from work, to exercise, to walk to the shop. I wish more men understood this feeling.
— LAURA. (@thelaurabird) March 10, 2021
Other women said they regularly message their friends to share their location so that they can keep track of each other and take alternative routes home when they feel they are being followed.
“I remember a man following me as I was walking home asking for my number once and I was like ‘oh great now I have to detour so he doesn’t know where I live’,” posted journalist and writer Mollie Goodfellow.
Some men took the opportunity of the discussion to ask how they can help to make women feel safer.
“I live less than five minutes from where Sarah Everard went missing. Everyone is on high alert,” posted London resident Stuart Edwards.
“Aside from giving as much space as possible on quieter streets and keeping face visible, is there anything else men can reasonably do to reduce the anxiety/spook factor?”
The question was welcomed by many women, with a number advising that men should try to give them space so they do not feel followed or threatened.
Critic Jay Rayner said: “I’ve said it before but will again: if I find myself walking behind a single woman on a quiet street I always cross the road to the other side and ideally accelerate away as quickly as possible.
I've said it before but will again: if I find myself walking behind a single woman on a quiet street I always cross the road to the other side and ideally accelerate away as quickly as possible. I am a big man and absolutely aware what my silhouette looks like in the darkness. https://t.co/ARnmWARBkv
— Jay Rayner (@jayrayner1) March 10, 2021
“I am a big man and absolutely aware what my silhouette looks like in the darkness.”
Author and broadcaster Darren McGarvey told men who felt angered by the situation what they should do: "Speak to women in your life. Listen. Read female writers, academic literature. Visit websites of women's groups.
"Donate to charities that advocate for women. That support women. Teach your sons what you weren't taught. Look yourself in the mirror. Recall the entitlement. The objectification. The 'banter'."
Both men and women have acknowledged that the way Ms Everard’s story has been received has created a gender divide, with author Rebecca Reid saying every woman she knows is “overwhelmed” by it.
“It’s the thing they teach us to be afraid of from childhood. It’s proof that we’re not afraid for no reason,” she tweeted.
Meanwhile, Spectator assistant editor Isabel Hardman appeared to ridicule suggestions that women should avoid leaving their homes in order to protect themselves.
“Incredible how normal it is for women to be told not to go out alone after dark,” she tweeted.
“Yet how strange and inexplicable this would seem if the same instruction – or even a curfew – were issued to men,” she added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel