THE UK Government is expected to set out plans to increase the number of Trident nuclear warheads next week in what has been described as a “highly provocative” move.
In 2015 the UK’s strategic defence review committed to “reduce the overall nuclear weapon stockpile to no more than 180” by the 2020s – but Whitehall sources indicated this cap may increase.
A report in The Guardian newspaper said the reasons for the move are unclear, and the exact increase in warhead numbers is currently unknown.
READ MORE: Trident: Labour to pledge commitment to nuclear weapons and NATO today
There is speculation however that the increase could be planned to persuade the US to co-fund aspects of the Trident replacement warhead in the next decade.
The UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons became effective in January of this year. The legally binding international agreement aims to ban nuclear weapons with a goal of their total elimination.
Addressing suggestions that the UK could increase its warhead numbers, David Cullen, the director of the Nuclear Information Service, said: “If this is confirmed, this would be a highly provocative move.
“The UK has repeatedly pointed to its reducing warhead stockpile as evidence that it is fulfilling its legal duties under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.”
He went on: “If they are tearing up decades of progress in reducing numbers, it will be a slap in the face to the 190 other members of the treaty, and will be regarded as a shocking breach of faith.”
MPs backed renewing Trident in 2016. Most Tories supported this, Labour were split and the SNP voted against.
The majority of Scots (56%) believe Trident should not be renewed. Trident is based on the west coast of Scotland, at HMNB Clyde.
Last month Labour announced its “non-negotiable” support for the nuclear weapons.
READ MORE: Trident removal critical to security of independent Scotland
According to the Ministry of Defence, the cost of developing the next generation of Dreadnought submarines to carry the new warhead may be upwards of £30 billion.
A spokesperson for the MoD said: “The UK is committed to maintaining its independent nuclear deterrent, which exists to deter the most extreme threats to our national security and way of life.
“Replacing the warhead and building four new Dreadnought class submarines are UK sovereign programmes that will maintain the deterrent into the future. We will not comment on speculation about the integrated review, which will be published on Tuesday.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel