THE Scottish Tories have been criticised by activists over gender equality after it emerged women account for less than a quarter of the party's Holyrood candidates.
Only 16 women are featured on the list of Tory candidates contesting 73 constituency seats for the Holyrood election in May.
Currently 80% of Tory MSPs are male, with 24 out of 30 representatives, and a similar proportion is expected in the next Parliament.
The party opted against gender-balancing selection despite only 11 of the 58 Tory MSPs elected since the birth of devolution in 1999, having been women.
READ MORE: Ruth Davidson's 'passed peak Nat' is same punch-line as she used in 2016
Former Tory MSP Mary Scanlon told the Sunday Times: “The party needs to re-examine its strategy and look at how women can be more valued and supported to enable them to be selected.
“It can only be to our electoral advantage.”
A party activist from the west of Scotland claimed several impressive potential female candidates were dismissed through the selection system, in favour of incumbents.
She said: “Women are the backbone of the activist base and many who came forward could have knocked the socks off current MSPs.
“The party should have endorsed fewer sitting members, and promoted new female talent.”
READ MORE: Mike Small: Tories spending while denying democracy won't save the Union
In contast, the SNP introduced a 50-50 gender balancing mechanism in their selection of candidates.
Additionally, women top seven of Labour’s eight regional lists.
A Tory spokesman commented: “We recognise there is still a lot of work to be done but we are aiming to elect more women than ever before and our first BAME MSPs.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel