SCOTLAND’S Justice Secretary has said a planned increase to the UK’s stock of nuclear weapons is “completely unacceptable” to the Scottish Government.
Announcing a new foreign policy strategy for the UK’s role in the world after Brexit and with the rise of China, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said the military would have to be “match-fit for the modern world”.
The UK Government will, according to the Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy, lift a cap on the number of nuclear warheads in the stockpile.
A pledge was made that numbers would not rise above 180 by the mid-2020s, but now that figure could go as high as 260 – although a policy of “deliberate ambiguity” will mean the total will never be confirmed to the public.
But the news has caused anger in Scotland, where the current nuclear deterrent is housed and the Scottish Government has long stated its opposition to nuclear weapons.
“One thing is absolutely clear – the UK Government’s plans to expand the stockpile of nuclear weapons are utterly unacceptable to the Scottish Government,” Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf said.
“Nuclear weapons are morally, strategically and economically wrong. Our opposition to Trident remains unequivocal.
“Scotland is home to one of the largest concentrations of nuclear weapons anywhere in the world, despite consistent and clear opposition from across civic Scotland and a clear majority of our elected politicians.
“The UK Government has wasted billions on weapons that must never be used – it is lamentable that just two months after the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons came into effect, the UK Government has concluded that even more nuclear weapons are required.”
Yousaf also said there had been a lack of engagement with the Scottish Government on the review and urged the UK Government to make commitments that any future shipbuilding would have benefits for Scotland.
READ MORE: 'A new low': UK Government to trade with countries failing human rights standards
He said: “With a damaging Brexit deal, increasingly strained relations with Europe, and the short-sighted decision to cut international aid, the UK Government is already facing a reduced international standing. This review seems unequal to the task of changing that.
“Scotland is, and will always remain, a responsible global citizen which will play a full and constructive role in the international community, sharing the values set out in the EU treaties: respect for human dignity, respect for human rights, freedom, equality, democracy, and the rule of law.”
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon also took to Twitter to highlight what she sees as the difference between the UK and Scottish governments.
She said: “Today, the UK Government will announce a massive increase in its stockpile of nuclear weapons. By contrast @scotgov will incorporate the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child into Scots law.”
The Scottish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) pointed out that the UK still had the ability “to inflict devastation at over a thousand times that unleashed on Hiroshima 75 years ago” despite steps to disarm.
Scottish CND chair Lynn Jamieson said: “What neo-colonial delusions and swaggering machismo goes from building ‘a better Britain’ to investment in more nuclear weapons – good for agonising mass death and poisoning for all living things but nothing else.”
Scottish Greens external affairs spokesperson Ross Greer added: “When we urgently need investment in a recovery from the pandemic and action to tackle the climate crisis, the decision to throw billions into these weapons is obscene. It’s increasingly clear that Scotland leaving the warmongering UK could be a huge step forward in international nuclear disarmament, forcing a major rethink of the UK’s Trident programme.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel