ACADEMICS have quit their role on a research board in protest over the UK Government's foreign aid cuts.
In a joint letter, the five women said they leave as co-chairs at the Arts and Humanities Research Council Strategic Advisory Board (International) with "deep regret and considerable dismay".
The letter was signed by Alison Phipps, Jo Beall, Olivette Otele, Zoe Norridge and Elena Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, who have held the job for three years.
The UK Government claim reducing aid spending to 0.5% is legitimate because of the extraordinary circumstances of the pandemic – which the legislation provides for – although it would not allow for it to become a permanent cut.
The UK has already announced it will give Yemen about £87m in aid this year, down from £164m in 2020, and leaked reports have suggested there are likely to be substantial cuts to other war-torn areas including cuts to Somalia by 60% and to South Sudan by 59%. The planned cut for Syria is reported at 67% and for Libya it is 63%.
READ MORE: There will be consequences to Westminster's savage foreign aid cuts
In a joint letter, the academics said UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), the national funding agency investing in science and research in the UK, was told by the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy not to communicate with the academics.
The letter read: "The meeting requested [with UKRI] was repeatedly rescheduled.
"We can now infer that this was due to the instruction received by UKRI from BEIS that no communication with any stakeholders could be forthcoming from UKRI staff. That this instruction also included UKRI's own advisory bodies on the very matters at stake is unfathomable to us.
"We also believe it to be an inexcusable breach of governance. In short, these actions have rendered the Strategic Advisory Board AHRC International defunct."
With deep regret & considerable dismay, we tender our resignation "We cannot be associated with or placed in a position of responsibility for a decision by the U.K. Government, implemented by #UKRI in this manner." @JoBeall1 @OlivetteOtele @ZoeNorridge @FiddianQasmiyeh #odacuts pic.twitter.com/ZyFUNTerOA
— Alison Phipps ኣልሰን (@alison_phipps) March 16, 2021
It continued: "We cannot be associated with or placed in a position of responsibility for a decision by the UK Government, implemented by UKRI in this manner, which shows such flagrant disregard for all the work our Principal Investigators are required to undertake on safeguarding, risk assessments, gender equity statements, fiduciary risk, log frames, and financial due diligence.
"The fallout of this decision for our partners, as our Arts and Humanities research has repeatedly shown, will have serious and deleterious consequences.
"The UK is poorer for its decision to cut ODA [Overseas Development Aid], even if the reasons for it may be understandable.
"There is no excuse, however, for the draconian and misguided manner of the cut to UKRI ODA funds or for the fact that it has been done without due process and the use of the advisory and governing means at its disposal."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel