MICHAEL Russell has reiterated his commitment to bringing the Government’s indyref2 bill to Parliament before May’s election.
The Constitution Secretary dismissed claims from the Tories that doing so ahead of the March 25 recess would be “completely irresponsible”.
The bill will set out the timing and potential question for a second independence referendum.
Responding to Scottish Conservative MSP Jeremy Balfour in Parliament, Russell confirmed the Scottish Government “will publish a draft independence Bill as announced in the programme for government, before the election recess begins”.
READ MORE: Michael Russell rejects Tory pleas as indyref2 bill to be set out in days
Balfour claimed ploughing ahead with the plan would be “completely irresponsible” and urged the Constitution Secretary to prioritise the “Covid recovery and getting businesses back on their feet, supporting people into work and investing in our schools to help children catch up with so much lost teaching time”.
Russell insisted his “urgent priority” was recovering from the pandemic, but “that has to be done by what the Scottish people choose rather than what Boris Johnson chooses – that’s the big difference”.
He added: "I would rather rebuild Scotland in a way that’s commensurate with the people of Scotland’s urgent necessities rather than Boris Johnson’s obsessions.”
Scottish Labour’s Colin Smyth asked the SNP minister if he was prioritising the pandemic recovery, why he believed a referendum could be held this year.
Russell replied: “The urgent necessity is for Scotland to build forward to give Scotland a sustainable future. That cannot be done by a UK Government and I’m disappointed the Labour Party still believes it can.”
READ MORE: SNP MP says 'once in a generation phrase' misused in indyref2 debate
It came after SNP MP Tommy Sheppard said in the Commons that he would welcome an independence referendum this year, but insisted that a vote would only take place if the pandemic is over.
He told MPs: “Let’s be entirely clear about this, no-one is suggesting that we have a referendum campaign during the pandemic. We will have to have that put behind us and be moving into a recovery phase before that can happen.
“I don’t want to ask people in Scotland about their future through the medium of a computer screen. I want people to be engaged in this debate as friends and as strangers in workplaces, in pubs, in parks. I want them talking about this energised in the way they were in 2014.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel