NICOLA Sturgeon has accused Alex Salmond and a Conservative MP who made serious allegations against her as being part of an “old boys’ club”.
The First Minister also referred to David Davis as being an “old pal” of her predecessor who had used his position in the Commons to spread “conspiracy theories”.
In heated exchanges at First Minister’s Questions, Sturgeon also called on Tory MSP Ruth Davidson to stop listening to Salmond and his “cronies”.
A Holyrood committee is investigating the Scottish Government’s mishandling of sexual misconduct complaints against Salmond when he was First Minister.
READ MORE: Ruth Davidson has checked out of FMQs as she gets ready for Lords role
Salmond pursued a judicial review and the court ruled the Government investigation had been unlawful and tainted by apparent bias. He was awarded more than £500,000 in legal costs by the Government.
MSPs are preparing to publish their report into what went wrong in the Government’s investigation, with Salmond and Sturgeon both appearing in person, for six and eight hours respectively, before the committee in recent weeks.
The former First Minister believes Sturgeon’s allies were involved in attempts to remove him from public life and even have him sent to jail, while she has accused him of “inhabiting an alternative reality” and pursuing false conspiracy claims.
The drama escalated this week after Davis used parliamentary privilege to put into the public domain messages that Salmond told the committee show a plot against him.
Also at FMQs, Davidson raised a claim made by Davis that a government legal document had been suppressed during Salmond’s successful legal challenge to the investigation and asked whether Sturgeon knew it had happened.
The First Minister replied: “It didn’t happen.”
In a blistering attack on Davis and Salmond, Sturgeon said: “Having David Davis, a Tory MP reading out in the House of Commons, under the protection of parliamentary privilege, his old pal Alex Salmond’s conspiracy theories about the sexual harassment allegations against him must be the very epitome of the old boys’ club.
“Anyone who chooses to cheer that on should not pretend to have the interests of the women concerned at heart.”
Davidson accused the Scottish Government of proceeding with an attempted cover-up after warnings emerged it could look “shifty” if information was withheld during Salmond’s legal challenge.
Sturgeon was asked about an email exchange in which the Government was told not disclosing the ultimately-damning evidence of prior contact between the two civil servants who made the complaints and the investigating officer could be “portrayed as a failed attempt at a cover-up”.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon hits out after leak of Alex Salmond inquiry report
Davidson asked Sturgeon: “Why did the Government go ahead with the attempt of the cover-up anyway?”
The First Minister replied: “What she has just quoted, what that actually means is counsel saying to Government: ‘Here are things we should hand over and we should hand them over – I think actually it was amend pleadings, although I’ll be corrected if I’m wrong on that – rather than have any suggestion that we’re trying to cover it up.’
“So what did we do? We amended the pleadings.”
After he won the judicial review, Salmond faced criminal charges and was last year acquitted in the High Court in Edinburgh of all 13 sexual offence charges against him.
An inquiry by James Hamilton QC, a former director of public prosecutions in Ireland, into whether the First Minister broke the Ministerial Code is expected to be published shortly.
She has denied breaching the code.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel