MARCH 8 was International Women’s Day. Three days later, on March 11, the body of Sarah Everard was found, after she was abducted and murdered. A police officer has been arrested in connection to the murder.
When you are a girl growing up, you’re taught certain things: “Don’t walk home alone”, “don’t have earphones in on a quiet street”, “cross the road, but subtly, if a group of people are coming towards you and you’re by yourself”, and on and on. The reason that Sarah Everard’s murder has sparked the conversation it has is because she followed all those “rules”. We have a culture where, when a crime is committed against a woman, we try to find the ways in which she deserved it. Did she dare walk the streets after drinking? Did she dare wear revealing clothes? Did she dare make a journey without getting someone to confirm her safe arrival? Did she break any of the rules listed above? “I mean, it’s terrible what happened, but what was she thinking...” etc.
READ MORE: In the wake of Sarah Everard men do nothing to stop sexism crippling society
Only this week in America, a racist man killed eight women, six of them Asian. The police who are investigating the issue stated that he wasn’t racist, simply a sex addict. That’s nine women dead at the hands of men in the past two weeks that have been widely reported. But there have been many more, and there will be many more. Every year Labour MP Jess Philips stands in the House of Commons and reads out the names of women killed by men, and every year we promise to do better. So, what is the Government’s response to this endless scandal?
A Policing Bill that seeks to scupper people’s right to protest.
Following the news of Sarah Everard’s body being found, women across the UK organised vigils to pay respect to her. Her death affected so many of us and they wanted to pay respects to her while protesting the violence that women live in fear of every day. These vigils and protests were peaceful, the attendants wore masks and were socially distanced. The police, rather than protect the attendees, attacked them. All over social media we saw videos of women, outnumbered two, three, four or five to one, pinned down and handcuffed. It was such a hugely disproportionate response that it reminded me of the ridiculous police response to the Black Lives Matter protests in America last year.
Interestingly enough, when those protests reached the UK last year, the UK Government didn’t bother to discuss the issue of racism. Instead, they announced plans to bring in prisons sentences and massive fines for people who damage statues of slave owners.
Now, when women protest the violence that we incur simply for existing, the UK Government ham-fistedly try and push through a Policing Bill that will send people to prison for up to 10 years if their protest annoys people.
READ MORE: SNP MP says curfew for men should be considered in areas where women are killed
The hypocrisy of the party that decries “wokeness” and “snowflakes” putting people in jail for simply upsetting them cannot be overstated. Then there’s the additional layer of hypocrisy from the Scottish Tories, who’ve spent months decrying the Scottish Government’s thoroughly scrutinised and debated Hate Crime Bill because of free speech concerns, voting in favour of this Policing Bill – which is a ridiculous attack on civil liberties – without a second look. There’s no limit to their brass neck.
Something the UK Government could have done, instead of trying to rush this bill through Parliament, is ratify the Istanbul Convention on Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence. It wouldn’t take them long, given that my former colleague Eilidh Whiteford wrote the bill for them in 2017. This is a column about women and violence against us, and its message is simple: stop it. If we have to teach our daughters to try and avoid violence then we must also start teaching our sons not to commit it. Women do the heavy lifting in society – we carry the most caring responsibility for people all ages. It’s time men start caring for us as much as we care for everyone else.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel