BORIS Johnson has come under fire after he appeared to get Douglas Ross's name wrong in the Commons.
During PMQs, it has been suggested that the Prime Minister referred to the Scottish Conservative party leader as "Murray Ross".
In a question to Johnson, Ian Blackford claimed Ross “doesn’t even have the courage to put himself before the voters in a Scottish constituency”.
He said: “We know that Tory leaders in Scotland have a habit of dodging democracy. Baroness Davidson is fleeing the House of Lords and the current Tory leader is too feart to stand in a constituency. No wonder this morning’s Daily Record declared that the Scottish Tories have exposed themselves as shameless, as nasty and just plain daft.
“They are led by a man so devoid of imagination that when asked what he would do if he was Prime Minister for a day replied, ‘I would like to see tougher enforcement against gypsy travellers’. Does the Prime Minister really have confidence in a Scottish Tory leader who doesn’t even have the courage to put himself before the voters in a Scottish constituency?
“The Scottish Tory leader is also seeking a place in the Scottish Parliament but is refusing to step down as an MP.
"So as his boss, will the Prime Minister order the member for Moray to resign his seat, avoid a dual mandate and save the taxpayer £175,000, or are dual mandates one more Tory policy where they think greed is good?”
WATCH: John Swinney blasts Tories for showing 'lowest standards I've ever seen'
Responding, the PM claimed the Ross was doing an “excellent job”, but also referred to him as “The Member for 'Murray and Ross'."
He said: “[Ross] is doing an excellent job of holding the SNP to account for their manifold failings not least on education, failing to deliver on crime, failing in my view to deliver for the people of Scotland, so caught up as they are in their desire for independence and another referendum for separation.
“[Blackford] represents a party that’s so devoid of imagination that it can’t come up with any workable solutions to help the people of Scotland improve their education, improve the fight against crime, cut taxes in Scotland where they’re the highest in the whole of the UK.”
“All they can talk about is a referendum to break up the UK… it’s twice he hasn’t mentioned it, maybe he’s getting nervous of singing that particular song.”
The move was criticised by SNP MP Drew Hendry who said: "'Murray Ross.' Interesting way for Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, to distance himself from the Tory shambles in Scotland. To be fair, he probably has genuinely forgotten who is doing his bidding here, he has so little interest."
"Murray Ross" Interesting way for Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, to distance himself from the Tory shambles in Scotland. To be fair, he probably has genuinely forgotten who is doing his bidding here, he has so little interest.
— Drew Hendry MP (@drewhendrySNP) March 24, 2021
Later in PMQs Johnson refused to confirm or deny rumours that veterans’ funding is to be cut.
The SNP’s Dave Doogan said: “Will the Prime Minister follow the SNP’s lead and assure the House today that he will not allow this cut to UK funding for veterans?”
Johnson replied: “Not only was this the first government to create a veterans’ minister specifically with the charge of looking after veterans, not only have we invested in them, but we have also taken steps to protect our armed forces veterans from vexatious litigation pursued by lefty lawyers – the kind sitting not a million miles from me today – who pursue them long after they have served Queen and country and where no new evidence has been provided.
“We tried to protect them, we have protected them, and that party voted against it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel