THE Scottish Greens are better prepared for the Holyrood election than they have been for any previous ballot, co-leader Patrick Harvie said, as he insisted there was no reason why they should not return a record number of MSPs in May.
Harvie also said this could be the election where his party makes the “breakthrough” of winning a constituency seat in the Scottish Parliament.
In the 2016 election, the Greens returned six MSPs, with candidates from five of their regional lists being voted in. This time round, Harvie said they could win an MSP in each of the eight regions – and that in areas such as the Lothians and Glasgow, they could win two.
His comments came as he refused to rule out the possibility of a coalition with the SNP after May 6 – if Nicola Sturgeon’s party fails to win an overall majority. But Harvie stressed the two pro-independence parties are “some way apart” on issues such as the use of fossil fuels and transport emissions.
Opinion polls this year have already suggested the Greens could win 10 or more seats this time at Holyrood. Harvie said: “This is the first time we have come into an election campaign with this really sustained period of a high polling average, as well as a really good level of organisation on the ground.
“So we feel that we are better prepared for this election than we have ever been in the past, as well as having that strong track record.”
He added: “There is no reason to think that there is any region in Scotland where we can’t return Green MSPs. In the regions where we don’t currently have someone, we were only a whisker away last time, and with the progress we have been making I am convinced we can have Green MSPs elected for every region.
“Clearly in Lothian, we have already shown we can have more than one elected, we can certainly do that in Glasgow. This could be the first time that we make the breakthrough and win a constituency seat for the first time in Glasgow Kelvin.”
On a potential coalition with the SNP, he said: “Obviously Greens have been in government in a number of other countries, that’s not actually very unusual across the European political landscape.
“Whatever the parliamentary arithmetic, we know that the SNP are quite some distance from us on issues like a time frame for transitioning away from fossil fuels, they still won’t rule out supporting more licences for exploration for even more oil and gas, and on things like transport policy where the emissions are going up, not down.
“Right now our focus is on getting out there with a positive and inspiring green message about the policies we have to offer and the impact we have already had.”
Meanwhile, Willie Rennie said yesterday that a message of “put the recovery first” will be at the heart of the LibDems’ election campaign, as he kicked off his election tour.
He said: “In the next Scottish Parliament, Liberal Democrats will put recovery first. That means cutting waits for mental health, delivering a bounce-back plan for education, more jobs and action on the climate.”
He added: “The Conservatives have shown themselves incapable of building an alliance in Scotland. It’s no secret that I get on well with Anas Sarwar and we have an awful lot in common and I’m sure we’d be able to work together on things.”
Scottish Labour leader Sarwar said he is showing “bold leadership” by taking on Sturgeon in her Glasgow constituency. Sarwar has chosen to stand in the city’s Southside seat, which the SNP leader won with a majority of almost 10,000 in 2016.
The Labour politician hit out at the levels of poverty in the area, saying Sturgeon should be focusing on this rather than independence. Speaking about his decision to run against the SNP leader, Sarwar said his home is in the constituency and it was his community.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel