THE Tories are under increasing pressure to launch an inquiry into their former leader after further revelations emerged about David Cameron’s involvement with a scandal-hit banker.
New reports allege the banker, Lex Greensill, was given privileged access to Whitehall departments.
An investigation by the Sunday Times says he enriched himself through a government-backed loan scheme he designed after the then-prime minister gave him access to 11 departments and agencies.
He founded Greensill Capital, the firm that went on to employ Cameron but later collapsed, causing uncertainty for thousands of jobs at Liberty Steel, having been its main financial backer.
Labour and Sir Alistair Graham, former chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, called for a full inquiry into the scandal.
The allegations surfaced after Cameron tried to persuade government figures to grant emergency loans to Greensill Capital, where he was an adviser.
The Sunday Times report alleged Greensill was given access to the departments while Cameron was in No 10 so he could promote a financial product he specialised in.
READ MORE: David Cameron under investigation over texts about Covid contracts
The Pharmacy Early Payment Scheme, announced in 2012, saw banks swiftly reimburse pharmacists for providing NHS prescriptions, for a fee, before recovering the money from the government. Greensill Capital went on to provide funds for the scheme.
Geensill could not be reached for comment, but the newspaper said he was understood to deny making large returns from a pharmacy deal.
Graham said: "There clearly should be a full inquiry because it sounds like a genuine scandal in which the public purse was put at risk without proper political authority."
Labour's shadow chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Rachel Reeves, said: "These reports raise very serious questions about the conduct of former Conservative prime minister David Cameron and the access he gave Lex Greensill to ministers and Whitehall departments.
"The British people deserve answers to those questions. That's why the Conservatives should agree to an urgent inquiry so we can get to the bottom of this latest scandal."
Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden defended his long-term ally on Sunday, saying Cameron is a "man of utmost integrity and I've no doubt at all he would have behaved properly".
Asked on The Andrew Marr Show if there would be an inquiry, the Cabinet minister responded: "As far as I can tell, no decision in government policy was changed as a result of any meetings that took place. They'd be properly declared."
A Government spokesman said: "Lex Greensill acted as a supply chain finance adviser from 2012 to 2015 and as a crown representative for three years from 2013.
"His appointment was approved in the normal manner and he was not paid for either role."
The office of Cameron, who was prime minister between 2010 and 2016, has not responded to a request for comment.
He was cleared of breaking lobbying rules by a watchdog after reportedly asking Chancellor Rishi Sunak to support Greensill Capital through the Government's Covid Corporate Financing Facility.
The Registrar of Consultant Lobbyists concluded that Cameron was an employee of Greensill Capital so was not required to declare himself on the register of consultant lobbyists.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel