Winner in 2016: Ruth Maguire (SNP)
ONE of the reasons Cunninghame North proved so pivotal for the SNP in 2007 was that the neighbouring constituency of Cunninghame South remained firmly in the Labour column.
The increase in the SNP vote here was actually well in excess of what Kenny Gibson achieved, as indeed was the net swing from Labour to SNP.
However, the much bigger cushion that Labour started with ensured they comfortably retained the seat.
That illustrates the inbuilt advantage Labour used to enjoy in Scottish politics – even when they were slightly behind the SNP on the national popular vote, they still found themselves in cruise control in the bulk of their traditional heartland seats. But naturally that advantage melted away in 2011 when the SNP’s national lead ceased to be slight and moved well into double digits.
Cunninghame South was one of 20 constituency seats Labour lost, and the margin of SNP victory was reasonably emphatic at around 11% – although admittedly that was still close enough to keep Labour within theoretical striking distance if the political weather had moved back in their favour.
Instead the opposite happened in 2016 due to the big swing from Labour to Tory, although unlike in Cunninghame North the Tories were starting from a very low base and were never in with a shout of edging into second place.
So Labour remain the challengers to the SNP, but the deficit they have to overcome is an incredibly daunting 22 percentage points. At the moment, it’s not even clear from national polls that there will be any swing back to Labour at all.
So it’s entirely possible that the SNP’s majority in the constituency could actually grow even bigger.
At the very least, then, the incumbent SNP MSP Ruth Maguire looks assured of a clear and decisive re-election.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel