NICOLA Sturgeon was always going to provide target practice for the other four leaders and so it proved with both her opponents and the audience getting stuck in – principally over whether matters constitutional would impact adversely on Covid recovery.
It did however mean that she got a fair amount of air time to combat the charges levelled at her government and its perceived failures – in health and education in particular.
Anas Sarwar on cancer treatment gap sites, and Willie Rennie on social care, reprised their greatest hits from the last batch of First Minister’s Questions.
Rennie, incidentally, was the first to mention the “S” word, flagging up the Alex v Nicola imbroglio twice in the first 15 minutes.
READ MORE: ‘Decisions must be taken in Scotland’: FM makes case for independence at BBC debate
Douglas Ross confirmed his status as the election’s one trick pony, endlessly talking up the folly, as he saw it, of having another referendum. Anas Sarwar twice called him out on this (I’ve always thought it passing strange that the party most obsessing on independence was not the party formed to fight for it, but the Tories).
Still, at least it saves them money on new literature and billboards. No2IndyRef2 turns out to have quite the shelf life.
At times the three Unionist parties sounded as if they had been writing a joint script in the green room; never has the word divisive worked so hard as they collectively set their face against another vote on self determination.
Canadian engineer Lorna Slater, co-convenor of the Greens, unsurprisingly came over best on climate change, including a particularly fine eye roll at Douglas Ross’ flannelling.
She needed to up her profile and didn’t do herself any harm. The most interesting subtext of the evening was the scratchy exchanges between Sarwar and Ross; Anas very evidently with the number two spot in Holyrood in his sights.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel