THE UK is no longer a country where the “system is deliberately rigged against ethnic minorities”, according to a landmark review commissioned by Westminster that has been branded "divisive".
The Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities said geography, family influence, socio-economic background, culture and religion all impact life chances more than racism, in a report commissioned in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement.
It also criticised the “confusing” way the term “institutional racism” has been applied, saying this should only be used when deep-seated, systemic racism is proved and not as a “catch-all” phrase for any microaggression.
The SNP said criticism of the report should be "a wake-up call" for the Tory government.
Labour said the report was a “divisive polemic” that has insulted people by downplaying institutional racism, while unions said the report was “deeply cynical” and denied the experiences of black and minority ethnic workers.
READ MORE: Westminster's commission on race is just another whitewash
The SNP candidate for Glasgow Kelvin, Kaukab Stewart, said: "The dismay and disappointment from organisations and stakeholders in response to the findings in the race report commissioned by Downing Street must serve as a wake-up call for Boris Johnson's Tory government.
"It's evident that the review fails to properly grasp the scale of the issue and concerns raised, and there are questions over the cynical manner in which this review was trailed before its full publication.
"We all need to have an open and honest conversation on race and the systematic and structural issues that perpetuate inequality. Only by acknowledging and understanding institutional racism will we be able to effectively tackle it in all aspects of life.
"It is vital that rather than brushing the issue under the carpet, the Tory government now heeds the concerns and works properly with communities and organisations to tackle the very real challenges facing ethnic minority communities in the UK."
Former Equality and Human Rights Commission chairman David Isaac said a focus on whether there is institutional racism is a “distraction”, and the report’s recommendations are “sensible”, but that major inequalities still need to be addressed.
In a foreword to the report, commission chairman Dr Tony Sewell said some communities are haunted by historic racism and there was a “reluctance to acknowledge that the UK had become open and fairer”.
He said the review found some evidence of bias, but often it was a perception that the wider society could not be trusted.
Dr Sewell wrote: “Put simply, we no longer see a Britain where the system is deliberately rigged against ethnic minorities.
“The impediments and disparities do exist, they are varied, and ironically very few of them are directly to do with racism.
“Too often ‘racism’ is the catch-all explanation, and can be simply implicitly accepted rather than explicitly examined.”
The commission said it takes racism seriously and does not deny it is a “real force” in the UK.
READ MORE: Anger as Downing Street study says there's no institutional racism in the UK
But it said there is an “increasingly strident form of anti-racism thinking that seeks to explain all minority disadvantage through the prism of white discrimination”.
This, it says, diverts attention from other reasons for disparities of outcome.
Shadow women and equalities secretary Marsha de Cordova said: “To downplay institutional racism in a pandemic where black, Asian and ethnic minority people have died disproportionately and are now twice as likely to be unemployed is an insult.”
Labour MP David Lammy said the report was an “insult to anybody and everybody across this country who experiences institutional racism”.
But Conservative MP Ben Bradley said the report reflects what he believes to be the view of the majority of people in the UK, calling it a “very welcome evidence-based addition to this conversation on inequality”.
NHS Providers said it disagreed with the report’s conclusions and said there is “clear and unmistakable” evidence that NHS ethnic minority staff have worse experiences and face more barriers than white counterparts.
Deputy chief executive of NHS Providers, Saffron Cordery said that denying the link between structural racism and health inequalities is “damaging”, adding: “Concrete action is needed to tackle structural racism, bias and discrimination in the health service, across other public services and across society.”
Dr Halima Begum, chief executive of the race equality think tank, the Runnymede Trust, added: “Frankly, by denying the evidence of institutional racism and tinkering with issues like unconscious bias training and use of the term ‘BAME’, I think they’ve insulted every ethnic minority in this country – the people who continue to experience racism on a daily basis.”
The Institute of Race Relations said the report’s findings and recommendations “fit neatly with the Government’s attempts, post-Brexit, to portray the British nation as a beacon of good race relations” and a model for countries across the globe.
Johnson said the Government will consider the recommendations, adding: “The entirety of Government remains fully committed to building a fairer Britain and taking the action needed to address disparities wherever they exist.“
READ MORE: Fury as Number 10 race report says slavery 'not just about profit and suffering'
The report was published in full at 11.30am on Wednesday, after the Government Equalities Office previously revealed selective highlights.
It follows wider discussions around racism following the death of George Floyd in the US last year, subsequent Black Lives Matter protests, elite sports stars taking the knee before football matches, and a claim by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in an explosive interview with Oprah Winfrey that a member of the royal family, not the Queen or the Duke of Edinburgh, made a racist comment about their son Archie.
The report notes improvements such as increasing diversity in elite profession, a shrinking ethnicity pay gap and that children from many ethnic communities do as well or better than white pupils in compulsory education.
It also notes that the Black Lives Matter protests last year saw many young people in Britain calling for change.
While it understands the “idealism” of these “well-intentioned” young people, it questions whether a narrative claiming that nothing has improved “will achieve anything beyond alienating the decent centre ground”.
It also heralds a new “era of participation”, but said this can only be achieved with the acknowledgement that the UK has undergone a fundamental shift to become a “more open society”.
And it concludes that progress is not achieved by “cleaving to a fatalistic account that insists nothing has changed”, adding: “It is closer contact, mutual understanding across ethnic groups and a shared commitment to equal opportunities that has contributed to the progress we have made.”
The 264-page report makes 24 recommendations, which the commission says have “tried to account for the messy reality of life” and are aimed at all disadvantaged people.
These include calls for increased scrutiny of body-worn police footage of stop and searches, more detailed, publicly available data, more local recruitment within police forces, and improved training to help officers interact with the communities they serve.
A pilot should be developed in four police areas where young people with low level possession of class B drugs should helped by public health services and diverted away from the criminal justice system, it recommends.
It also calls for an Office for Health Disparities to be established to tackle health inequalities, and for a review on action to address the underlying issues facing families.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel