THE Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) is, for the first time, publishing a range of briefing notes on the Holyrood election and what the various political parties are proposing for the coming parliamentary term.
Co-funded by the Scottish Policy Foundation, the briefings will cover what has happened with Scottish tax, benefits and public spending, as well as parties’ manifesto commitments.
The IFS said with fiscal devolution and the growing differences in policies compared to the rest of the UK, along with the starkly different visions of Scotland’s future set out by the different parties, meant independent, impartial analysis is more important now than ever before.
It will host a live webinar on April 26 in partnership with the University of Glasgow, where it will present the main findings of its analysis ahead of the elections. Two presentations will be made – the first, on the trends and choices made in recent years, the second looking at what the biggest parties propose for tax, benefits and major areas of public spending.
David Phillips, an associate director at the IFS, has published a briefing that considers the changes to the level and composition of the Scottish Government budget over the past 10 years.
His report said that the period between 2010-11 and 2017-18 was one of austerity, with real-terms, day-to-day funding falling by almost 6% over the seven years. However, since then funding has been increasing and had almost returned to 2010–11 levels by 2019–20. Excluding the additional temporary funding provided by the UK Government to address the Covid-19 pandemic, the plans suggested “core” funding will be around 3% higher in 2021–22.
After accounting for population growth, though, it will still be around 2% lower per person.
The report said these trends largely reflected changes in funding from the UK Government, although the use of devolved tax, borrowing and reserve powers has also had a growing impact on the Scottish Government’s overall funding.
Phillips told The National: “We have started this work because the Scotland Act 2016 has led to growing divergences in tax and benefit policy and means more of the sorts of issues we typically analyse at UK elections are now being decided in Scotland.
“Scottish Government decisions are having a growing impact on overall funding levels, but UK Government decisions are still the big drivers – explaining both the high relative levels of funding and the cuts seen in the early-to-mid-2010s (not yet fully-undone) and the tight outlook for 2021-22.”
He added: “And there are issues with the fiscal framework and devolution settlements that have come to the fore with Covid-19 and Brexit and, for example, the Internal Market Bill that we will be looking at this year, with an initial piece before the election on May 6 too.
“Scrutiny of tax, benefit and public spending trends and issues – and the role of the devolved and UK governments in these – is increasingly important as policies both interact and diverge more.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel