THE SNP have said that the choice of “Bairns not Bombs” has never been clearer after the publication of a report which says that removing Trident from an independent Scotland would be “a major obstacle” to the country joining Nato.
The report for the European Leadership Network by Rear Admiral John Gower, the former assistant chief of defence staff (nuclear andchemical, biological) in the Ministry of Defence , states: “Nato must clarify that, should an independent Scotland adopt policies that seriously jeopardise or remove a nuclear deterrent which provides a vital element of Alliance security, this would at the very least present a major obstacle to, and could very well render impossible, Nato membership for a future independent Scotland.”
Retired since 2014, Gower was a submarine commander who has held senior positions within Nato and was a naval attache in Washington.
In his report, Implications for United Kingdom nuclear deterrence should the Union fail, he points to Brexit as a threat to the Union: “Since the momentous vote on 23 June 2016 which triggered the long process of the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union, the spectre of the secession of Scotland from the United Kingdom has been resurrected time and again.
“The Covid pandemic response has weakened, not strengthened, the ties which bind the Union, and the manner and detail of the final EU exit agreement has further exacerbated the differences between Scotland and England.
“The changes in UK nuclear policy announced in the 2021 Integrated review have further distanced UK policy from the principles of the Scottish National Party, thereby increasing the risk of secession. This would significantly impact the UK’s ability to field a submarine-based deterrent.
“The SNP is implacably and repeatedly against nuclear weapons yet has declared intent to seek Nato membership once independent. The March 2021 announcements in the UK’s Integrated Review that the UK will reverse its previous policy of drawing down its nuclear stockpile to 180 warheads by instead setting a new, and higher even than 2010, stockpile ceiling of 260 has widened the gulf between the SNP’s and the UK’s policies.”
Gower adds: “Today, for an independent Scotland, joining the nuclear alliance Nato on a political non-nuclear platform would be at best exceedingly difficult. Joining as the country which had either effectively severely destabilised or incapacitated the UK deterrent should be even more challenging.
“The secretary general should build on his 2017 warning that Scotland should not assume Nato entry, with a clear message that an anti-nuclear stance with negative effects on the Alliance would likely result in the refusal of an application to join. It is incumbent upon the secretary general to make this abundantly clear to the UK, and Scottish voters in particular, in advance of any future referendum.”
SNP candidate for Glasgow Anniesland, Bill Kidd, said: “Nuclear weapons are abhorrent and have no place in an independent Scotland.
“Nato membership is by no means dependant on nuclear weapons. Of the 30 members of Nato, just three have nuclear weapons – they are the exception in the world, not the rule.
“Boris Johnson’s UK Tory government has its priorities all wrong. In the same week, the SNP was enshrining children’s rights into Scots Law, the Tories were increasing the UK’s nuclear arsenal by 40% – the contrast of Bairns not Bombs could not be clearer.
“In 4 weeks, Scotland faces a choice of two futures, one with a Tory government that prioritises beefing up its nuclear arsenal or one that prioritises Scotland’s children.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel