MATT Hancock has been linked to the murky dealings of David Cameron and scandal-hit financier Lex Greensill.
The Sunday Times revealed that the Health Secretary met the pair for a "private drink" to discuss a payment scheme later rolled out in the NHS.
The Treasury also reconsidered Greensill's application for an emergency coronavirus loan after the former prime minister messaged a senior adviser to Boris Johnson.
Cameron was said to have described the decision to exclude his employer's firm, Greensill Capital, from the multibillion-pound scheme as "nuts" and pressed for the Chancellor to reconsider.
"What we need is for Rishi [Sunak] to have a good look at this and ask officials to find a way of making it work," Cameron wrote last year.
The developments are the latest in a lobbying controversy that has dogged the Conservative former prime minister in recent weeks.
Questions were mounting over his efforts to secure access for the finance company, which later collapsed putting thousands of UK steelmaking jobs at risk.
Greensill was understood to have written to Hancock's office about the payment scheme in August 2019, copying in NHS England chairman Lord Prior, before the Health Secretary commissioned advice from officials.
An ally of Hancock confirmed a drink took place between Cameron, the Health Secretary and the Australian financier in October 2019.
Greensill's firm at the time wanted to introduce a flexible scheme to pay doctors and nurses either daily or weekly.
NHS SBS, a joint venture between the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and a French IT firm, went on to announce in October last year that Earnd, a mobile app that was then a division of Greensill, would be available free-of-charge to NHS employees to access their pay.
Hancock had referred Greensill to work directly with the NHS rather than his department, according to the ally, who insisted the final decision to use the scheme was for local NHS employers.
"Matt acted in entirely the correct way – he updated officials on the business that was discussed, as is appropriate," the friend said.
Cameron is yet to comment publicly about the "growing scandal", as Labour has called it.
But a source close to the former prime minister said: "David Cameron was an enthusiastic champion of Greensill's pay product, Earnd, and met with various people to discuss its rollout across the NHS."
A DHSC spokesman said: "The wellbeing of NHS staff is the top priority of the department and Health Secretary.
"Our approach was and is that local NHS employers are best placed to decide how different pay flexibilities fit with their overall pay and reward offer for their staff."
Meanwhile, it was understood that Cameron's message to the Prime Minister's adviser was forwarded on to the Treasury.
But it could not be immediately confirmed whether the lobbying did lead to the Treasury reconsidering its move to reject the loan scheme application.
A No 10 spokesman: "Throughout the pandemic, an immense number of businesses contacted Downing Street with representations; these were passed on to relevant departments."
This week, it emerged the Chancellor responded to private texts from Cameron saying he had "pushed" officials to consider plans that could have helped Greensill in 2020.
Labour called for Sunak to "come out of hiding" and make a statement to Parliament about the "growing scandal", and reiterated demands for an investigation.
Labour shadow chief secretary to the treasury, Bridget Phillipson, said: "Every day brings fresh revelations about the culture of cronyism at the heart of this Conservative Government.
"Through David Cameron, Greensill looks to have had the run of Government from Number 10 down, including access to millions of pounds of public money."
Labour MP Dame Margaret Hodge, a former chair of the Commons Public Accounts Committee, added: "We need an independent inquiry immediately. The whole scandal stinks."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel