Winner in 2016: Sandra White (SNP)
GLASGOW Kelvin has a different character from other constituencies in the city due to its relative affluence and substantial student population.
Nevertheless, it’s followed a fairly typical pattern since devolution, with Labour winning decisively in 1999 and 2003, and then more narrowly in 2007, before the SNP gained the seat in 2011 and saw their margin of victory dramatically increase in 2016.
Any obvious impact from the student vote has only been felt when the Greens have intervened by putting up a candidate, and before this year they had only done so twice.
In 2007 Martin Bartos took 12.6% of the vote for the Greens and leapfrogged the Liberal Democrats and the Tories into third place.
Given that Labour’s margin of victory over the SNP was only 5%, it’s theoretically possible that the Greens’ decision to stand robbed the SNP of a chance to make a landmark gain.
However, local election transfers over the years have shown that some Green supporters prefer Labour to the SNP, so the likelihood is that Labour would have narrowly held on even without Green involvement.
In 2016 the Greens ramped things up further by putting forward their very well known co-leader Patrick Harvie. He did roughly twice as well as Bartos, and remarkably overtook Labour to claim second place.
It looks like he ate into the SNP’s potential support, because at 38.5% the SNP’s vote share was very much on the low side by the standards of other Glasgow seats.
He’ll be standing again this year, and has the advantage of facing a relatively unknown SNP opponent due to the retirement of incumbent MSP Sandra White.
Some have suggested that the circumstances are perfect for him to win the seat outright. However, it’s possible that the 24% vote share he secured last time is close to the natural ceiling of Green support.
And despite the perception of a two-horse SNP-Green race, it’s by no means clear that he’ll be able to attract anti-SNP tactical votes, because a lot of the reasons unionist voters have for disliking the SNP also apply to the Greens.
In some ways it would be more logical for the Tories to be providing the main challenge to the SNP, given their strong tradition in the area. Kelvin is a successor to the old Westminster seat of Hillhead, which remained in Tory hands even later than Cathcart.
It wasn’t lost until Roy Jenkins took his famous by-election gain for the SDP in 1982, and therefore the locality might have been expected to be at the epicentre of any Glasgow Tory revival in Ruth Davidson’s breakthrough year of 2016.
Instead, the Tories continued to languish in a dismal fourth place in a constituency that Davidson herself had contested five years earlier.
So Harvie does look like the only viable alternative to the SNP – but his chances of victory may depend on the Greens taking the bulk of the pro-indy vote, and there’s no real precedent for that in a parliamentary election. The smart money remains on the SNP to hold the seat.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel