NICOLA Sturgeon has accused Douglas Ross of arrogance and questioned his commitment to democracy following his refusal to accept Scotland has a legitimate route to independence.
The First Minister hit out after the Scottish Tory leader repeatedly rejected opportunities to set out a democratic path to separation from the Union.
The Moray MP also declined to confirm that he would accept the result of the Holyrood election after being asked if a pro-independence majority would represent a mandate for indyref2.
Responding to the comments, made during an interview with Channel 4 News, Sturgeon tweeted: “At stake here is a simple democratic principle that can unite those for and against independence – it is Scotland’s right to decide.
“The arrogant assertion that the Tories get to decide for us – no matter how Scotland votes – should be given short shrift by every democrat.”
At stake here is a simple democratic principle that can unite those for and against independence - it is Scotland’s right to decide. The arrogant assertion that the Tories get to decide for us - no matter how Scotland votes - should be given short shrift by every democrat. https://t.co/ku6bkAbtf5
— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) April 20, 2021
Outgoing Scottish Conservative Holyrood leader Ruth Davidson dismissed the criticism.
She replied: “Scotland did decide. We voted to stay in the UK.”
But the reply prompted further criticism from online observers.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross refuses six chances to accept there is democratic path to independence
Scottish Greens co-leader Lorna Later commented: “Quite a lot of water under the bridge since then [2014]. If we believe in governing by consent, we should see if people have changed their minds.
“Surely if the union is so wonderful, you'd look forward to campaigning for it? This position just looks like you're afraid you'll lose.”
Quite a lot of water under the bridge since then. If we believe in governing by consent, we should see if people have changed their minds. Surely if the union is so wonderful, you'd look forward to campaigning for it? This position just looks like you're afraid you'll lose. https://t.co/91oCKAdDec
— Lorna Slater (@lornaslater) April 20, 2021
Law professor Paul Bernal added: "Scotland also decided to stay in the EU. Oh."
In the pre-election grilling on Channel 4 News, Ross was asked to spell out the democratic path to an independence referendum
He said: "People in Scotland can decide on May 6 to get a parliament that is laser-focused on our recovery on rebuilding Scotland, we do that by stopping an SNP majority.
“And the tried and tested method to stop the SNP is to vote for the Scottish Conservatives because we’ve got the strength across the country to stand up to the SNP to challenge them and to stop their plans to divide our country with another independence referendum."
He was pressed by the interviewer several more times, but refused to budge from that stance.
The Moray MP was also asked – as Donald Trump was ahead of the US election – if he would accept the result of the vote. Specifically, Ross was quizzed on whether he would acknowledge a pro-independence majority would represent a mandate for indyref2.
He replied: "I’m not going to speculate on the outcome of an election that’s not been held yet.”
Again, the Scottish Tory refused to reconsider his stance when pressed further by the reporter.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel