JOHNNY Mercer has said he had “no choice” but to leave the Government after frustration at a lack of progress over legislation to protect British veterans who served during the Troubles.
Downing Street confirmed on Tuesday evening that the Prime Minister had accepted Mercer’s resignation as veterans minister following speculation he intended to quit the post.
However, the former Army officer said on Twitter that he was “sorry to have been relieved of my responsibilities in Government” amid reports that he was sacked by Boris Johnson.
The Government was last week thwarted by the House of Lords in its attempt to pass a bill designed to make Armed Forces veterans and serving personnel exempt from "vexatious" prosecution for historic alleged war crimes.
The legislation, which is going through its final stages in Parliament, was developed in response to legal claims made after operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, but does not cover incidents in Northern Ireland.
Peers demanded that war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and torture are all excluded from future legal safeguards for UK forces fighting overseas.
The Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill has been championed by Mercer.
I’m sorry to have been relieved of my responsibilities in Government tonight. pic.twitter.com/AWai59fVhE
— Johnny Mercer (@JohnnyMercerUK) April 20, 2021
In a letter to the Prime Minister, which was posted on Twitter, Mercer said the Government risks “damaging an already bruised veterans cohort further” with the proposals.
He said he had hoped Johnson’s premiership would “signal a step change in veterans affairs in the UK” and that he had raised his concerns in a face-to-face meeting with him.
“It is with a heavy heart that I am forced to offer you my resignation from your Government,” Mercer said in the letter.
“I am of course, desperately sad events have transpired the way they have – I truly have exhausted my efforts and my team to make it work.
“But the truth is politics always was a means to change how this country treats her military veterans, and I remain genuinely appalled by the experiences of some of this nation’s finest people who have served in the Armed Forces.
“I fought and bled alongside them, I’ve been far more fortunate than many of them since, and I have a duty to tell their truth to power.”
Mercer said in the letter to the Prime Minister that not including those who served during the Troubles was his “red line”, adding: “I am deeply proud of my predecessors who served in Northern Ireland.
“They are not second-class veterans. They deserve the protections of the Overseas Operations Bill like everyone else.
“I made promises on your behalf that we would not leave them behind and would walk through simultaneous legislation for them. No discernible efforts have been made to do so, and I can see no prospect of this changing.
“I have no choice but to leave Government and campaign for them in Parliament.”
Johnson thanked Mercer for his service as a minister following his resignation on Tuesday, according to a Downing Street spokeswoman.
The statement released shortly after 7pm said: “This evening the Prime Minister has accepted the resignation of Johnny Mercer as minister for defence people and veterans.
“He thanks Johnny Mercer for his service as a Government minister since 2019.”
The Prime Minister said in a letter to Mercer that he was “grateful” for his contribution as veterans minister and that he had “made a real difference” to the lives of defence personnel and veterans.
“I am grateful for your service and for everything you have done in the role,” the letter said.
“Alongside helping today’s veterans, you have put in place the solid foundations to build and expand our support for veterans in the future.
“The Office for Veterans’ Affairs has established cross-government leadership to improve the lives of those who have served this country.
“Your determination to fix problems and to make life better for our defence personnel and veterans has made a real difference, and I am grateful for everything that you have done.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel