WESTMINSTER will try anything to stop Scottish independence.
Whether it’s scheming to claim our oil for England or undermining devolution, there’s no trick too dirty for Downing Street.
Granted, they’ve given the independence movement a gift in the form of appointing Boris Johnson to Number 10, but don’t let his astounding unpopularity north of the Border distract from the fact he’s intent on keeping us in our box.
He and his ministers have several masterplans in the works to stop us from going our separate ways – including plastering their own walls, as well as Scottish play parks, with Union flags.
But a new scheme to prevent a Yes vote has seemingly been uncovered.
It comes in an unexpected form, amid reports that the UK Government is considering backing a “British Super League”.
The plans would involve Rangers and Celtic being absorbed into the English Premier League.
READ MORE: Celtic and Rangers 'wanted' in new British Super League following European breakaway collapse
According to The Sun, the proposals could be backed by Downing Street – in a bid to quell support for independence.
Yes, you read that correctly.
It comes after Boris Johnson vehemently opposed plans for a breakaway European Super League – which proved to be about as popular as the PM is in Scotland.
The successful campaign to stop England’s richest football clubs taking a permanent seat in an exclusive cabal of European superclubs has prompted a rethink about the dynamics of the footballing pyramid in the UK, it is reported.
It is said the Premier League and global governing body FIFA would support plans to incorporate Celtic and Rangers into the English top flight.
But most notably, the Sun claims the Prime Minister is keen on the plans because it could dent hopes for an independent Scotland.
The paper reports: “And while PM Boris Johnson launched into the Super League debate by insisting he would throw every possible obstacle in the way of the changes, the prospect of including Rangers and Celtic in a cross-border UK league would be a potential factor in the fight against the proposed second Scottish independence referendum.
“Ibrox and Parkhead supporters, excited at the prospect of locking horns with England’s big guns, might be tempted to strengthen resistance against the SNP-led breakaway plans.”
The UK Government remained tight-lipped when approached for comment.
Given some of their previous brainwaves, would anyone actually be surprised by this plan?
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel