DAVID Cameron repeatedly lobbied Bank of England officials as he grew increasingly frustrated about Greensill Capital’s failure to access a state-backed coronavirus support scheme.
The former prime minister, who worked as an adviser for Lex Greensill’s financial firm, also contacted the Treasury as he tried unsuccessfully to get the firm’s activities covered by the Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF).
Cameron wrote several times to the Bank’s deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, who had been the former prime minister’s envoy to the European Union, about the “incredibly frustrating” situation.
Correspondence since March 1, 2020 was released under Freedom of Information laws.
Cameron emailed Sir Jon Cunliffe, the Bank’s deputy governor, on March 5 2020, the first in a series of emails and calls disclosed between the former prime minister, Greensill and Threadneedle Street.
READ MORE: Westminster: Calls for greater oversight of minister interests amid Greensill row
On March 17, Greensill and Cameron held a call with Bank officials to explain Greensill Capital’s supply chain finance operation.
The minutes of the call note that Greensill Capital “explained that they were coming under significant pressure in current market conditions” and called for a re-establishment of the secured commercial paper facility scheme used in the 2009 financial crisis to “ease market conditions and protect the supply of working capital to the real economy”.
By April 2020, the correspondence moved on to Greensill’s attempts to access the newly-created CCFF, under which the Bank lent money directly to large companies, backed by the Treasury.
On April 3 2020, Cameron wrote to deputy governor Sir Jon “to ask for your help”, claiming Greensill had numerous conversations with the Treasury but “have failed to get anywhere”.
He said “the request is simple”, asking for the CCFF to cover bonds issued in respect of supply chain finance – the area of business which Greensill specialised in.
Cameron claimed this would allow Greensill to “pump billions” into small firms, including every pharmacy working with the NHS.
As his efforts failed to make progress, Cameron wrote on April 22 2020, telling Sir Jon it was “incredibly frustrating”.
“Even a small participation of SCF in the CCFF would make a big difference in catalysing the market,” he said.
Cameron acknowledged that ultimately the scope of the scheme was a “Treasury call” – adding that “we continue to talk to them at every level” – but he asked Sir Jon to have a “one-to-one call” with Greensill.
READ MORE: Senior Tory who served under David Cameron defends 'robust system' on lobbying
A Bank write-up of that call said that most if it was taken up by “Lex explaining their business model”, while Sir Jon was “clear that Greensill would currently fall outside the boundaries of the scheme” and that changes to the parameters were a matter for the Treasury.
At a Commons Public Accounts Committee hearing today, Treasury permanent secretary Sir Tom Scholar said Rishi Sunak’s department was “persistently” lobbied by Greensill.
Sir Tom told the committee that he believed the Treasury had dealt with the company’s approaches – including from Cameron – in a “completely appropriate way”.
Charles Roxburgh, the second permanent secretary in the department, told MPs the firm’s approaches were rejected because they were outside the scope of the scheme.
“They were proposing that special purpose vehicles could have access to the scheme and that was not consistent with the scheme’s design,” he said.
“They were suggesting that the CCFF should buy commercial paper that had non-standard terms and again that was not consistent with the design.”
Greensill collapsed in March 2021, threatening thousands of UK jobs at Liberty Steel which was dependent on its finance.
Shadow chancellor Anneliese Dodds said: “These emails confirm that Greensill wasn’t shy about the financial trouble it was in last year.”
Referring to a suggestion by Greensill that a facility of up to £20 billion was needed for the supply chain finance sector, Dodds said: “They were sending the begging bowl round to the Bank for England for up to £20bn in support in March, and yet the Government granted the failed lending firm access to hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayer-backed loans in June.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon denies Fergus Ewing dinner can be likened to Tory Greensill scandal
Greensill was approved as a Coronavirus Large Business Interruption Loan Scheme lender in June 2020, providing state-backed loans to businesses.
Dodds said the Chancellor now had to “come clean about his role in the return of Conservative sleaze” by publishing details of every call, text and “secret meeting” he had with Greensill.
Sunak has already released two text messages he sent to Cameron.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here