SCOTTISH independence could be at risk from elite interests who ignore the climate change crisis, campaigners have warned.
While one of the outcomes would be a new position in global politics, there is a danger an independent Scotland could be “captured” by those who would not challenge the current system.
The warning was given yesterday at the Scottish Independence and the Path to Climate Justice workshop, organised as part of the COP26 Coalition’s Global Gathering: Taking Action Now campaign.
“We can’t let an independent foreign policy mean ingratiating ourselves with powerful countries and entering the race-to-the-bottom on workers’ rights and taxation. Instead, an independent Scotland should be brave and fight for climate justice for everyone, everywhere,” said Katie Gallogly-Swan, policy coordinator of the Global Green New Deal.
She said although an independent Scotland could have a seat on institutions like the United Nations, the World Trade Organisation and the International Monetary Fund, global governance was currently not advancing the rights and interests of the majority of the world – whether that was working class communities in Scotland or the citizens of the Global South who had contributed least to climate change but were suffering the worst health and economic consequences.
Gallogly-Swan said the persistence of imperialism, particularly in the global economic architecture, could be resisted by an independent Scotland in solidarity with formerly colonised countries in the interests of a more equitable future everywhere.
But she warned: “There is a huge risk independence would be captured by elite or ignorant interests who would not challenge the system that is hurtling us towards extinction.”
Mim Black of Climate Camp Scotland said the campaigns for independence and climate justice must both be committed to tackling the root causes of the injustices the world faced, whether it was climate injustice, economic injustice or racial injustice.
She said it was a potentially transformative time that could lead to radical change.
“Our global political-economic system has pushed us past breaking point where inequality is not only accepted but indeed required for profit, and those profits – mostly of large corporations – hold vastly more political weight than any needs of the people,” said Black.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here