THREE major Scottish financial institutions – NatWest Group, Lloyds Banking Group and Standard Life Aberdeen – invested a total of £7 billion in nuclear weapons over a two-year period.
A new report, seen by The Ferret, also reveals two Scots universities held £2.4 million of investments in companies that undertake work related to nuclear weapons, while 11 council pension funds together had £275m invested in 20 firms in the sector.
The study is by Don’t Bank On The Bomb Scotland, a network of organisations campaigning for banks, universities, pension funds and public bodies to divest from companies involved in the production of nuclear weapons. It says these organisations together held investments worth £7.2bn in nuclear weapons producers between 2018 and 2020.
Don’t Bank On The Bomb Scotland is calling for divestment. It argues that organisations investing in nuclear weapon producers are “supporting activities that contravene commitments made under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty”.
In reply, investors say they have robust environmental, social and ethical policies in place and some fund managers claim engagement is more effective than divestment at changing company behaviour.
Medact Scotland, Scottish CND, Pax Christi Scotland and the Edinburgh Peace and Justice Centre are all members of Don’t Bank On The Bomb Scotland.
The umbrella group says there is a heightened global nuclear risk at the moment. It points to tensions between the US, Israel and Iran over the latter’s nuclear programme, and deadly clashes between nuclear-armed nations India and China in the western Himalayas.
READ MORE: Independent Scotland could be trailblazer for nuclear disarmament, Greens say
In the UK, nuclear weapons are once again a major political issue following the UK Government’s recent announcement it would increase the number of nuclear warheads in its stockpile by up to 44%, a move described by Don’t Bank On The Bomb Scotland as “shocking”.
Its report says that nuclear-armed nations are spending “vast sums of money” maintaining and upgrading their nuclear arsenals, with many companies profiting from these modernisation programmes.
The group argues these programmes are at odds with international treaties. It claims organisations investing in nuclear weapons producers are “supporting activities that contravene commitments” made under the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
International law on nuclear weapons was strengthened in January 2021 by the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), the study says. The treaty prohibits the development, production, testing, possession, transfer, use and threat of use of nuclear weapons.
Don’t Bank On The Bomb Scotland’s report says the treaty is important to note for investors because financial assistance may be viewed as unlawful under international law.
The roles of three major financial groups based in Edinburgh are highlighted by the report. It says Natwest Group, formerly RBS, held investments worth £2bn in 15 companies between January 2018 and January 2020. These investments were made primarily in the form of loans and through the underwriting of bond issuances, while shareholdings make up a small proportion of the total.
Natwest has a policy which “only partially restricts investment in nuclear weapons producers”, the report claims. Meetings were held with the bank in 2020 and March 2021 and Don’t Bank On The Bomb Scotland said it sent an open letter to it, drawing attention to the “catastrophic humanitarian and environmental consequences of nuclear weapons” and the recent entry into force of the TPNW.
READ MORE: Alba Party MSPs will fight to get Trident out of Scotland, Alex Salmond says
The letter called on the bank to exclude nuclear weapons from investment and was co-signed by more than 40 civil society organisations, including trade unions, faith organisations and environmental NGOs.
In reply, a NatWest Group spokesperson told The Ferret: “We have robust policies and processes relating to the defence sector through our environmental, social and ethical risk management framework.
“Our policies reflect adherence to national and international laws and regulations, wherever they apply. We have also incorporated a number of voluntary standards such as the Equator Principles and the UN Global Compact.”
Lloyds Banking Group, which is registered in Edinburgh, is also named. It invested £3.4bn in 10 nuclear weapons producers between January 2018 and January 2020, the report says. These investments were made primarily in the form of loans and through the underwriting of bond issuances.
THE report says: “Lloyds Banking Group’s defence sector policy states that the group will not support businesses involved in the manufacture, sale, trade, servicing or stockpiling of nuclear weapons other than when these activities are undertaken in connection with the national nuclear weapons programmes of the UK, US or France. Companies that may be involved in the manufacture, trading, storage or servicing of nuclear weapons for the UK, US or France are subject to ‘robust due diligence’. This policy applies to Lloyds’ subsidiaries, including Bank of Scotland.”
But Don’t Bank On The Bomb Scotland argues this policy is “not comprehensive” because nuclear weapons producers are not excluded unless they are involved in the nuclear weapons programme of a non-Nato state.
A spokesperson for Lloyds Banking Group said: “We do not comment on client relationships, viewing them as confidential.”
READ MORE: The last thing we need on the Clyde is more nuclear weapons
A statement on the Lloyds Banking Group website says: “We aim to offer customers sustainable investment choices and challenge companies we invest in to behave more sustainably and responsibly.”
Standard Life Aberdeen, headquartered in Edinburgh, is also cited. The report says the company offers customers some socially responsible investment funds that exclude nuclear weapons producers but adds that most of its funds do not.
“The company owned or managed shares worth over £1.5bn in 20 of the world’s top 28 nuclear weapons producers between January 2018 and January 2020. Standard Life Aberdeen should stop investing in weapons of mass destruction,” the report says.
Standard Life Aberdeen did not reply to our request for a comment. A statement on its website says: “We have been integrating environmental, social and governance considerations into our investment process since the 1990s. Investing responsibly is not only the right thing to do, it also helps us to identify opportunities and manage risks.
“ESG investment is about active engagement, with the goal of improving the performance of assets we manage around the globe. We want to make a difference – for our clients and customers, society and the planet.”
Both Glasgow University and Strathclyde University also invest in the nuclear weapons industry. The former held shares worth £1.9m in 16 companies as of September 30, 2020. Strathclyde University owned shares worth £473,633 in two companies – BAE Systems and Thales.
Don’t Bank On The Bomb Scotland calls for “student activism” to “persuade” these universities to change their investment strategies. It claimed the University of Edinburgh changed its policy on arms investments in 2016 in response to a five-year “responsible investment campaign”, led by students.
The report adds that at least six Scots universities have policies that either explicitly or implicitly restrict investment in nuclear weapons producers. “It is clear that the University of Glasgow and the University of Strathclyde are outliers when it comes to nuclear weapons investments in the Scottish higher education sector,” the study says.
In reply, a spokesperson for Glasgow University said: “The university has taken the decision not to invest in tobacco companies and to actively disinvest in those dealing in fossil fuel.
“The university decided against currently disinvesting in companies in the defence sector (including major local employers such as Thales and BAE Systems) but has lobbied governments and businesses against licences being granted to companies to export arms equipment to countries which are classed by the UK Government as having committed, or are at risk of committing, human rights abuses.”
READ MORE: Greens in pledge to ban Trident before Scottish independence
Strathclyde University did not reply to our requests for a comment.
ON council pension funds, the study found that 11 funds collectively held shares worth more than £275m in 20 companies that undertake work related to nuclear weapons as at September 30, 2020.
Lothian Pension Fund was the largest investor in nuclear weapons, holding shares worth nearly £126m in five nuclear weapons producers. This includes £102m invested in the world’s largest arms company, Lockheed Martin. Strathclyde Pension Fund came second, holding shares worth £120m in 16 companies.
Don’t Bank On The Bomb Scotland said: “Most Scottish local authority pension funds are reluctant to exclude harmful industries from investment. However, a growing number of Scottish councils are taking a stand against nuclear weapons investments by passing a resolution that calls on their pension fund to divest from nuclear weapons producers.
“One fund, Scottish Borders, already has a policy that restricts investment in controversial weapons, including nuclear weapons.”
Council funds say they address environmental, social and governance issues through “engagement” with the companies they invest in. Some funds also point out they are subject to a legal obligation to act in the best interests of fund members which precludes them from divesting from harmful industries.
A spokesman for Strathclyde Pension Fund said: “The previous asset list will have reflected the period when the US index was held directly – and the second the fund’s preferred position to hold indexes in pooled funds.”
The Ferret is an editorially independent, not-for-profit co-operative run by its journalists and subscribers. You can find it at https://theferret.scot/ and can subscribe for £3 a month here: https://theferret.scot/subscribe/
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here