THE Scottish Greens have launched plans that would see at least two national parks created in the next five years.
The party suggested seven potential sites for the new parks, in Wester Ross, Galloway, Glen Affric, Harris, the Borders, Ben Nevis and on the west coast.
Decisions would be reached about the new parks based on local support, the contribution to public access and the potential for the protection of wildlife.
The current national parks, Loch Lomond and the Trossachs and the Cairngorms, would also see their funding double under the plans, as well as the creation of regional parks.
READ MORE: Holyrood election: Poll predicts pro-independence majority of 31 seats
Speaking ahead of a visit to Loch Lomond on Tuesday, Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie (below) said: “A Scot invented the notion of a national park, so it’s shameful that we have so few here in Scotland, and those that we do have are in poor condition and under threat.
“Unlike the great American national parks, ours are not run for and by the people, but instead are dominated by grouse shooting and commercial developments that threaten vital wildlife habitats.
“The Scottish Greens will renew our national and regional parks as part of our bold, co-ordinated efforts to restore nature and tackle the climate and nature emergencies.
“That means at least doubling the number of national parks and creating regional parks to restore our natural environment, boost tourism and create rural jobs.”
The party’s plans would also see the creation of a National Parks Service to support the management of parks across the country, while park authorities would be given more powers to grant subsidies within their boundaries to support land restoration.
A land acquisition fund would also be set up, to allow park authorities to purchase land within its boundaries, meaning they could be “managed by the people, for the people”, a report released by the Greens said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel