A SCOTTISH Tory MSP has been accused of being “ill at ease with democracy” after panning a Scottish council for recognising Palestine as a state.
The row was sparked when the SNP-run local authority in Dundee backed the “largely symbolic” move in a vote.
The city is twinned with Nablus in the West Bank and councillors heard from the Dundee Nablus Twinning Association, the Dundee Trades Union Council and Palestine’s ambassador to the UK before making their decision.
Some 23 city representatives voted in favour, with three Tory members opposed – they instead backed an amendment which said it should be for UK Government diplomats to decide on recognising Palestine as a state.
Responding to the news, Tory MSP Adam Tomkins tweeted: “In the long and bonkers tradition of local authorities making foreign policy up as they go...”
In the long and bonkers tradition of local authorities making foreign policy up as they go.... https://t.co/VE1qzSUG7g
— Adam Tomkins (@ProfTomkins) April 26, 2021
That comment sparked outrage, with senior SNP politicians hitting back.
The party’s depute leader Keith Brown replied: “Increasingly, someone ill at ease with democracy, local or otherwise...”
Increasingly, someone ill at ease with democracy, local or otherwise.... https://t.co/QQZuPbKHTn
— Keith Brown (@KeithBrownSNP) April 26, 2021
It comes after Tomkins was heavily criticised for arguing the Act of Union should no longer be based on consent, but rule of law.
READ MORE: Breaking down Adam Tomkin's plans to curb democracy with new Act of Union
Responding to the outgoing Tory MSP, Humza Yousaf highlighted a historic intervention by a Scottish council, when Glasgow granted Nelson Mandela the freedom of the city in 1981.
The Justice Secretary wrote: “Should we not applaud our Councils for looking beyond their own boundaries & taking positions on foreign affairs?
“If we left it to UK Govt, Glasgow would not have given Mandela freedom of the City, at a time when Tories were calling him a terrorist & calling for his execution.”
Should we not applaud our Councils for looking beyond their own boundaries & taking positions on foreign affairs?
— Humza Yousaf (@HumzaYousaf) April 26, 2021
If we left it to UK Govt, Glasgow would not have given Mandela freedom of the City, at a time when Tories were calling him a terrorist & calling for his execution. https://t.co/byQhPk0gZ8
SNP MSP Sandra White added: "There are none so blind that cannot see the situation in Palestine and the oppression of the Palestinian people is Britain’s Shame, Thank You Dundee City Council."
But Tomkins was also backed by Conservative politicians.
Angus councillor and Holyrood candidate Braden Davy commented: "Nationalist run local council thinks it's job is international affairs. Running theme of nationalists reaching for powers they don't have to distract from their failures over powers they do."
LibDem councillor Fraser Macpherson, who proposed the motion, said after the vote that his colleagues should be proud of their decision.
“I think it is very disappointing that the UK Government has not acted on the vote in October 2014 whereby 247 votes to 12 the House of Commons did state that the government should recognise the State of Palestine in securing a peaceful future,” he said.
“I think it’s really important on the part of us that we put as much pressure as we can on our own government to act on the decision of the House of Commons.”
Tory representatives raised objections, but did not disagree with the principle of the motion.
Councillor Derek Scott said: “I do agree that Palestine should be recognised a state, but where I differ from the contribution so far is the timing of that.
“The government has said that the UK will recognise Palestine when it best serves the objectives of peace.
“I think I would defer to the diplomats in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office who are best placed to make that judgement.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel