SARAH Vine has sought to justify Boris Johnson’s lavish spending on his Downing Street flat by insisting the Prime Minister "can't be expected to live in a skip".
The wife of Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove said the Prime Minister must live "to a certain standard" and that it is "perfectly reasonable" for him to splash the cash on new sofas.
It comes as the Electoral Commission announced it will launch a formal investigation into the refurbishment of his Downing Street flat after confirming there are “reasonable grounds to suspect that an offence or offences may have occurred”.
Prime ministers are allocated a budget of up to £30,000 per year to renovate their official residency, but newspaper reports have suggested Johnson has spent up to £200,000 on the changes.
According to the Daily Mail, the Tory chief told aides he could not afford the revamp of his Downing Street flat as the costs started to spiral.
The newspaper reported that he had said the cost was "totally out of control" and that his fiancee Carrie Symonds was "buying gold wallpaper".
The company Soane, co-founded by Lulu Lytle and said to have been commissioned by Symonds, has wallpaper on its website in "old gold" and "yellow gold".
Johnson has previously suggested he has made sacrifices for the good of the country because he could earn more money outside politics.
At the Tory leadership hustings in 2019, he said: "It is obviously possible to make more money by not being a full-time politician."
After quitting the Cabinet over Brexit in 2018, Johnson resumed his Daily Telegraph column for which he was paid £275,000 annually, and commanded huge fees as a corporate speaker, with one event earning him £42,580.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson to be investigated by Electoral Commission over flat refurbishment
Vine, a Daily Mail columnist, said someone needs to "bite the bullet" and say that a fund is needed to ensure "decent furnishings" at Downing Street.
She told the BBC Radio Four Today programme: "The thing about the whole No 10 refurbishment thing is that the Prime Minister can't be expected to live in a skip.
"He has to live to a certain standard and the problem with all of these political things like this is that no-one is ever prepared to bite the bullet.
"No-one is ever prepared to say 'look, this building does need to be maintained, there do need to be decent furnishings, we do need to have a fund that pays for it, let's just do it'."
Vine said Johnson is "working 24 hours a day, seven days a week, trying to run the country which is quite a difficult job to do". That’s despite a senior Downing Street adviser telling the Sunday Times in the early days of the pandemic that the Prime Minister “didn’t chair any meetings, liked his country breaks and didn’t work weekends”.
Vine added: "If he wants to have a pink sofa instead of a green sofa, I think that's a perfectly reasonable thing for him to want."
While she does not think the taxpayer should fund such work, she said a "transparent" arrangement for refurbishment is the way forward.
She told Today: "I think if it was just very transparent and simple, and it was a trust or whatever, and it was clear what the situation was and there was a clear budget, say £30,000 a year or whatever it is, or when there's a new incumbent there's a one-off payment that enables you to change the curtains, I think that would be very clear and very simple."
She said this approach would mean "my husband wouldn't have to cancel all his very important NHS procurement meetings on an afternoon to go and answer an urgent question about curtains".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel