A TORY minister has defended Boris Johnson’s decision to remain the final arbitrator of any standards investigations, including over the renovation of his Downing Street flat.
Nadhim Zahawi insisted it is “only right” that the newly-appointed ministerial standards adviser reports to the Prime Minister as Labour criticised the arrangement for meaning Johnson “effectively marks his own homework”.
Lord Geidt’s review into whether any donations for the refurbishments were properly declared became one of three under way after the Electoral Commission launched a formal investigation, saying there are “reasonable grounds” to suspect an offence.
Downing Street has said Johnson would be “happy” to assist the watchdog’s inquiries into who initially paid for the work and whether any donation was properly declared, as the Prime Minister insisted he has not broken any laws or rules.
READ MORE: PMQs: Boris Johnson refuses to answer questions about flat scandal
But Labour has warned Lord Geidt’s position is not truly independent because Johnson continues to be the “ultimate arbiter” of the ministerial code, therefore allowing the Prime Minister to be “judge and jury” of his own behaviour.
But Vaccines Minister Mr Zahawi, backing the crossbench peer as a “really creditable individual”, issued a defence of the system.
“All ministers serve with the confidence of the Prime Minister – I think that’s right, that is the right system to have,” he told BBC Breakfast.
“So it is only right that the adviser on ministerial conduct has to be able to report to the Prime Minister.”
Lord Geidt was appointed to the position yesterday, five months after the resignation of his predecessor Sir Alex Allan.
Allan quit in response to Johnson standing by Priti Patel despite an investigation finding the Home Secretary’s conduct “amounted to behaviour that can be described as bullying”.
Lord Geidt does not have the power to launch his own investigations and No 10 confirmed that the Prime Minister remains the final adjudicator of any breaches.
READ MORE: WATCH: First-time voters back Nicola Sturgeon – and reject Boris Johnson
Labour’s shadow chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Rachel Reeves said: “The Prime Minister can’t be judge and jury on his ministers’ – or indeed his own – behaviour.
“The Prime Minister shouldn’t be able to block investigations into his ministers or himself when breaking the ministerial code.”
Lord Geidt has been tasked with “ascertaining the facts surrounding” the renovation and advising Johnson “on any further registration of interests that may be needed”.
In separate inquiries, Electoral Commission investigators can demand documents and information, and could potentially seek a statutory interview with the Prime Minister as part of the process.
Cabinet Secretary Simon Case, who is head of the Civil Service, is also undertaking a review.
Johnson has said he “personally” paid for the renovations but has refused to say whether he received an initial donation from the Conservative Party to cover the costs reported to be up to £200,000.
Chancellor Rishi Sunak has made it public that he paid “upfront and entirely at his own expense” when he redecorated his own Downing Street flat last year.
Questions have been mounting over the flat since former aide Dominic Cummings accused Johnson of wanting donors to “secretly pay” for the renovations to the apartment in a “possibly illegal” move.
The Electoral Commission said its investigation will “determine whether any transactions relating” to the renovations “fall within the regime regulated by the commission and whether such funding was reported as required”.
The Conservative Party said it would “continue to work constructively” with the commission.
“We believe all reportable donations have been transparently and correctly declared and published by the Electoral Commission,” a spokesman said.
READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: Can Boris Johnson weather 'let Covid bodies pile high' storm?
Prime ministers get a budget of up to £30,000 per year to renovate their Downing Street residency, but newspaper reports have suggested Johnson’s costs have spiralled.
Tory peer Lord Brownlow said in an email leaked to the Daily Mail that he was making a £58,000 donation to the Conservatives “to cover the payments the party has already made on behalf of the soon-to-be-formed ‘Downing Street Trust’”.
The appointment of former private secretary to the Queen Lord Geidt as the new adviser paves the way for the publication of the latest register of ministerial interests, which could contain details of any donations to fund the flat.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel