VIEWERS criticised BBC Breakfast host Naga Munchetty’s interview with Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie this morning as she pressed him on his party’s independence stance.
Viewers accused the presenter of asking questions in an “aggressive manner” and creating a “hostile” interview environment.
The segment got off to a bumpy start as Munchetty asked if they could “dive straight in with this issue of a second independence referendum”.
She asked: “If you were in government and supporting, propping up the SNP, would you support it, in its drive for independence, a second referendum within the next one or two years?”
Harvie replied that “obviously” Scottish politics is about much more than the constitution – adding that only the media is “speculating” about some from of coalition between the two parties after next week’s election.
The co-leader had not finished the sentence before Munchetty jumped in and said: “Okay, well here’s the deal. Why don’t we talk about that and then we’ll also talk about the other issues as well.”
A good-natured Harvie went on to make the Green position – which is to hold a referendum within the next parliamentary term – clear.
READ MORE: Scottish Greens launch 'bold' manifesto with pledge to hold indyref2
“Not immediately, not during the current public health crisis, but once that has passed. The Covid-19 recovery phase is when we ask deep questions about the kind of society we want to see emerge,” he explained.
Munchetty persisted in her line of questioning, asking again: “So would you support the SNP in its drive for a referendum within one or two years?”
Smiling, Harvie responded: “Would they support our drive?
“Our position is that it should be called within the next five years. I think the SNP are saying it should be within the first half of the parliament.
“My personal view is once the emergency legislation, the coronavirus emergency legislation, is no longer in place, that might be a reasonable time to start pinning down a date.
“I think it’s a little too soon just now but clearly, it can be down within the next five years.”
Online, Twitter users were unhappy with the questioning. “I really don’t understand why Naga Munchetty began the interview with Patrick Harvie in such an aggressive manner,” tweeted @sdoddsy.
“Totally unwarranted. It would be nice if they put half as much effort into challenging the Tories bunging public cash to their mates.”
“Shouldn’t they put the same amount of effort into all their interviews?” One follower replied.
READ MORE: Holyrood election: Poll predicts pro-independence majority of 31 seats
Another Scot added: “Oh dear, what a wasted interview with Patrick Harvey. You can see straight from the get-go that the interview is hostile.”
Meanwhile another Twitter user said the interview was “dreadful” and called on interviewers to “at least try to be polite”.
Recent polling shows the Greens are on track to gain a number of MSPs at the May 6 Scottish Parliament election.
This week’s Savanta ComRes survey indicated they could more than double their current number of representatives, achieving 11 seats.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel