NICOLA Sturgeon has revealed she felt close to being "broken" at the height of the row with Alex Salmond.
The First Minister described her feelings over the feud with her predecessor in an interview with the leading current affairs and cultural magazine in the United States, the New Yorker.
"The past year has accentuated Sturgeon’s leadership qualities," the feature by the periodical's London-based journalist Sam Knight reported.
"But it has also been politically traumatic. In 2018, Salmond, her predecessor and mentor, was accused of sexually harassing staff while he was in office. An investigation by Sturgeon’s government into the allegations was mishandled, and a subsequent criminal prosecution, in which Salmond was tried for attempted rape, ended in his acquittal."
It added: "The scandal ruined one of the most important relationships of Sturgeon’s life and came close to removing her from office. Earlier this year, two separate inquiries into the Salmond case explored whether Sturgeon had lied to the Scottish Parliament.
"She narrowly survived. 'I think my political opponents—I don’t know, maybe Alex himself ... There was an element of ‘We can break her,’ you know? Almost kind of personally as well as politically. That was how it felt,' Sturgeon told me. 'And, you know, there were days when they might have come closer than they knew. But they didn’t.'"
The article, published today, profiles the First Minister ahead of the Holyrood election on Thursday focusing on the independence goal, and how it has been provided by fresh impetus by Brexit, Scotland's vote to remain in the EU and by Sturgeon's handling of the pandemic.
READ MORE: 'Queen of Scots' Nicola Sturgeon may lead nation to independence, French report says
Salmond, Andrew Wilson, the former MSP and author of the SNP's Growth Commission, former health secretary Shona Robison and former first minister Lord McConnell are among the people interviewed.
Discussing his feud with Sturgeon and the Holyrood inquiry into his successful legal fight with her government, Salmond told the magazine: “If I wanted to destroy her, that could have been done.”
Salmond, who now leads the Alba Party, also attacked Sturgeon for failing to advance the case for independence since he left office ion the wake of the No result of 2014.
He said: “The problem that Nicola has, and it is one entirely of her own making, is that the case for independence hasn’t advanced one iota since 2014.”
Discussing independence the article underlined that the SNP stress the potential of Scotland as a small European nation.
"The SNP sees an independent Scotland taking its rightful place alongside other small states, such as Ireland, Denmark, and Finland, secure within the broader architecture of the EU," it said.
"Sturgeon embodies an apparent oxymoron: a left-of-center nationalist. The SNP is explicitly pro-immigration—it wants Scotland’s population to increase—and attentive to the rights of children, refugees, and trans people.
"Since the mid-nineties, the SNP has tacked carefully to the left of Labour, opposing the Iraq War, in 2003, and displacing the Party from its historic dominance north of the English border.
"Scotland’s government controls about sixty per cent of spending in the country—the rest is overseen by London—and the SNP has made the country’s tax code more progressive while also funding free university tuition and personal care for the elderly, and reducing the voting age to sixteen."
It added: "Sturgeon implores Scots 'to work as if we are indeed living in the early days of a better nation,' a quote attributed to the Canadian poet Dennis Lee, but she complains that she must govern with one hand behind her back.
"Sturgeon would like to introduce a universal basic income, and wants Scotland to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2045, five years ahead of the rest of the U.K.
"She invites comparisons to other female leaders of beautiful, small, forward-thinking countries, such as Jacinda Ardern, of New Zealand, and Katrín Jakobsdóttir, of Iceland. Sturgeon has described Birgitte Nyborg, the fictional Prime Minister of Denmark in the TV show “Borgen,” as her favorite onscreen politician. In 2019, she gave a TED talk about the importance of placing measures of a country’s well-being ahead of its GDP."
The feature continued: "At the same time, she is an absolutist, who yearns to break apart one of the world’s oldest and most successful democracies. 'I think she is profoundly impressive,' the former [Tory] Cabinet minister said. 'But she is bad. . . . In the end, there is nothing that matters for her other than this dream of creating an independent Scotland, which, remember—if she won by one vote, she would prefer to split the country irrevocably.'"
READ MORE: Top EU diplomat at centre of row with Boris Johnson to visit Scotland 'very soon'
The report said Brexit had consolidated support for a Scottish independence referendum, but also complicating the matter too factor as the UK has now left both the EU single market and its customs union.
"As a result, new customs and border checks are conducted on most goods traded with Europe. If Scotland becomes independent, it will have to choose between borderless trade with the rest of the UK to which it exports around sixty billion pounds’ worth of goods a year, and joining the EU's single market, to which it exports a quarter of that amount.
"In February, the London School of Economics calculated that, in trade terms, leaving the U.K. would be two or three times as damaging to Scotland’s economy as Brexit has been.
"Sturgeon avoids the dilemma of an economic border with England, which has not existed for three centuries, by insisting that she doesn’t want one."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel