I HAVE long been an advocate for squeezing in as many TV debates as possible, so I feel partly responsible for both the good and the bad of the final leaders’ debate of the campaign.
As is only fair, I will start with the good.
This debate offered leaders a platform to put some meat on the bones. The first few rounds of questions focused on substantive policy areas and the candidates (for the most part) stuck to their earlier pledge not to talk over one another.
Which brings me on to the bad.
Nicola Sturgeon, as our current First Minister and likely next one, is the candidate that is rightly and properly under the most scrutiny. She will face questions that the other leaders will not. She has a record to defend and nobody should complain when she is asked to do so.
But that cuts both ways. It is only fair that she is afforded the opportunity to respond to the barrage of questions being thrown her way.
Douglas Ross gave off huge disgruntled-ex-boyfriend vibes, with the way he needled, interrupted, patronised and belittled Sturgeon when she was trying to answer questions.
I suspect Nicola Sturgeon won’t lose much sleep at being spoken over by the Scottish Tory leader but voters – especially women – would have found it a turn-off.
Anas Sarwar was middling, after enjoying strong performances in previous debates. He will be hoping that his plea of “LET’S STOP TALKING ABOUT IT” will be enough to make some gains on his party’s woeful performance in recent years.
Patrick Harvie was assured and clear, but he could have been more assertive in making himself heard amongst all the yapping.
Willie Rennie had his best debate of the campaign so far. His “I can’t be bothered with this shite” answer to the question about the Royal yacht was a highlight.
With less than 48 hours until voters go to the polls, few will have had their minds changed by the TV debate. But it was a good palate cleanser for the drama to come.
READ MORE DEBATE ANALYSIS:
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel