TENSION was palpable as we reached the final leaders’ debate of Holyrood21. Would it be a Line of Duty anti-climax or a Rumble in the Jungle knockout?
Nicola was in saintly white cream and the guys in ill-fitting M&S suits – except for Patrick Harvie who was his usual natty, tailored self. A feisty debate was had by all.
Boris Johnson prize for irony: Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross says that “we’ve got to be more honest with the public”.
Best reply: “Why we are discussing this?” – Scottish LibDem leader Willie Rennie rightly declines to debate silly plan for a new royal yacht.
Having your cake and eating it: Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar condemns austerity but says he has “presumption of no tax rises over next parliament”.
Terminology least likely understood by new EU voters: “Fairer taxation” (translation: tax rises).
Back from the grave: All-round support for national collective wage bargaining (last heard of under Jim Callaghan).
Laying it on the line: First Minister Nicola Sturgeon says she “won’t countenance an illegal referendum”.
Most irritating catchphrase: “Nicola Sturgeon has taken her eye off the ball” (drones the referee).
Best barb: Sarwar wounds Ross over not backing NHS pay rise.
Biggest surprise: Sarwar says that “we should not be afraid of doing things differently in Scotland”.
Best bank manager impression: Rennie.
I’m in charge moment: When a smiling First Minister tells fatuous Glenn Campbell “can we not have a proper debate?”
Post-pandemic exit lines: Everyone says they want to hug their relatives.
Who’s learned most on the debate trail: Former dentist Sarwar was more self-assured by the day.
Issue strangely missing from the debates: Gender.
Final countdown: Douglas Ross (-5), Willie Rennie (1), Patrick Harvie (7), Nicola Sturgeon (7), Annas Sarwar (8).
My idle thought when the chat got predictable: What’s happened to the FM’s usual campaign helicopter?
See you in 2026 ...
READ MORE DEBATE ANALYSIS:
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel