A FORMER top Tory advisor has been accused of making “basic mistakes” after he published an opinion piece which appears to include inaccurate quotes from the First Minister.
In the article, Gerald Warner states that the Scottish public are “about to award a further four years of governance” to the SNP.
The Holyrood parliamentary period is five years, having been extended by a 2020 Act of the Scottish Parliament.
A former special advisor to Scottish Secretary Michael Forsyth (below), Warner also attacks the SNP’s record on education in his article published today by Reaction.life, a London-based website chaired by Tory peer Robert Gascoyne-Cecin.
Warner, who was described as an “unashamed right-winger” in the 1995 Herald article on his appointment, penned the article entitled "The Brigadoon fantasy election – voters in a trance set to reward SNP for wrecking Scotland".
In the piece, he accuses the SNP of showing “contempt for the voters’ intelligence” by mentioning an Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) review in their manifesto, despite that review having not yet been published.
READ MORE: Line of Duty's Martin Compston turns tables on anti-SNP Twitter troll
The former Sunday Times columnist claims this report is a “state secret” which “Nicola Sturgeon has refused to publish … until after the election – an indication of its damning contents”.
Warner adds: “What other political party in the Western world would dare to introduce into its manifesto a pledge relating to a report it has suppressed?”
However, the story Warner is referring to was resoundingly debunked earlier this year, with Green MSP Ross Greer accusing Unionist opponents of “deliberate misinformation”.
Labour MSP Daniel Johnson, Tory MSP Jamie Greene (above), and Scottish LibDem leader Willie Rennie all suggested the Scottish Government was intentionally hiding the findings of the report.
However, Greer shared an email he had received from the OECD on Twitter proving that it was that organisation, and not the Edinburgh government, which had ruled the review should not yet be published.
The Green MSP wrote: “The Tories and LibDems don't give a damn about Scottish education. They're spreading deliberate misinformation. Why? To undermine devolution.
“Here's the correspondence confirming that the OECD, not the Scottish Govt, ruled the unfinished draft report on CfE can't be published.”
The Tories and Lib Dems don't give a damn about Scottish education. They're spreading deliberate misinformation. Why? To undermine devolution.
— Ross Greer (@Ross_Greer) March 13, 2021
Here's the correspondence confirming that the OECD, not the Scottish Govt, ruled the unfinished draft report on CfE can't be published. pic.twitter.com/41fEY6s8RI
In his article published today, Warner also suggests that an independent Scotland may fail to join the European Union due to a Spanish veto and claims that “Sturgeon hubristically claimed she would win a supermajority in today’s election”, something The National was unable to find that she had ever said.
It is Alex Salmond’s Alba Party who are pursuing an independence “supermajority”. Although Salmond has not defined this number, it normally refers to a two-thirds majority, which would be around 86 seats in Holyrood.
Nevertheless, Warner goes on: “Sturgeon is now trying to distort expectations by referring to her 60-odd putative seats, plus a possible eight or nine for the Greens, as a ‘supermajority for independence’.”
As far as The National can tell, Nicola Sturgeon has not said this.
READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: Unionism's decline shown clearly in hapless Douglas Ross
He claims that it is SNP voters and the Scottish parliament which are “totally divorced from reality”.
He finishes: “Whatever constitutional demands Nicola Sturgeon may make, the answer is no.”
Academic and National columnist Gerry Hassan shared Warner’s article on Twitter, commenting: “The ridiculous take of Gerald Warner on Scotland's election with basic mistakes. Thinks Nicola Sturgeon wants a 'supermajority' & the Scot Parl's term lasts 4 years.
“Pours personal abuse on Patrick Harvie which shows the Greens are doing something right.”
The ridiculous take of Gerald Warner on Scotland's election with basic mistakes. Thinks Nicola Sturgeon wants a 'supermajority' & the Scot Parl's term lasts 4 years. Pours personal abuse on Patrick Harvie which shows the Greens are doing something right. https://t.co/kMhrac1tc5
— Gerry Hassan (@GerryHassan) May 6, 2021
Warner calls Harvie “leader of the Green loons” and claims he “is the biggest buffoon in the Scottish parliament”.
Warner heaps praise on Boris Johnson and the English electorate, which he says are in a mood of “hard-headed realism, focused on material recovery”.
He adds: “[In England] the Conservatives are heavily in the lead because, having got Brexit done, Boris went on to preside over a world-leading vaccine rollout.”
Reaction.life has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel