A LEADING ITV News journalist has backed holding indyref2, saying he doesn’t believe it would be “credible” to deny a new vote if Scotland achieves a pro-independence majority.
Tom Bradby, former political editor for ITV News and now presenter of ITV News at Ten, rumbled Unionist feathers on social media as he made the statement last night.
Scotland is set to return a pro-independence majority to Holyrood today, but the Westminster media is focused on whether the SNP will achieve a majority – whether the party can remains to be seen.
The SNP made key gains yesterday, winning in Ruth Davidson’s former seat of Edinburgh Central, Labour stronghold East Lothian and long-term Tory seat Ayr. They held all their other seats.
However the gains in South Scotland are likely to lead to a reduction in the number of list seats Nicola Sturgeon’s party can secure today, so other gains are required for an SNP majority.
Regardless, the pro-independence Scottish Greens sound confident as we go into the regional list portion of the results.
On Twitter yesterday evening, Bradby wrote: “If the SNP can assemble a pro-independence majority here tonight or tomorrow, I just can't see how it would be credible to deny them another referendum. It would make an absolute mockery of the principle of democratic devolution.”
If the SNP can assemble a pro independence majority here tonight or tomorrow, I just can't see how it would be credible to deny them another referendum. It would make an absolute mockery of the principle of democratic devolution.
— tom bradby (@tombradby) May 7, 2021
His comments angered Unionist commentators, with one asking if we would just “keep holding referendums until the SNP get what they want”.
He replied concisely: “Well, if people keep voting for parties that have that as a central policy then I guess, yeah. That’s how democracy works.”
Labour peer George Foulkes told the journalist: “No it wouldn’t! You don’t understand devolution.”
And Michael Crick, political correspondent at Mail Plus, was also unhappy with Bradby’s comments. “I’m very sorry Tom, that may be your personal view, but it is not right that you as a senior presenter of ITV programmes regulated by Ofcom, should express it in public.
“It goes against everything ITN used to stand for.”
READ MORE: LIVE: All the news from the Scottish Parliament election as seats are declared
Another peer, the Tory Lord Moylan, told Bradby: “It’s perfectly credible. The deal was a referendum once a generation. Government, investment, jobs are all thrown into doubt if a referendum can be triggered by a poll every four or five years. @BorisJohnson just needs to stand firm and say no.”
Despite the fury among Unionist respondents, Bradby won praise from independence supporters for expressing his view.
Meanwhile this morning Environment Secretary George Eustice said granting a second independence referendum in Scotland would be “irresponsible”.
His comments come after Boris Johnson told the Daily Telegraph another referendum would be “irresponsible and reckless” in the “current context” as Britain emerges from the coronavirus crisis.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel