PETER Murrell has hit out at the BBC's coverage of the Holyrood election.
The SNP chief executive said the broadcaster had left Tory politicians unchallenged, despite the fact votes for the Tories were down so far in the count.
He tweeted: "Weirdly opposition politicians unchallenged on @BBCScotlandNews claiming vote increases, and yet results say that their party votes actually down after 41 seats declared."
Weirdly opposition politicians unchallenged on @BBCScotlandNews claiming vote increases, and yet results say that their party votes actually down after 41 seats declared. https://t.co/Khb9Mr6oxr
— Peter Murrell (@PeterMurrell) May 7, 2021
Out of the 48 constituency seats declared so far, the SNP have 39 seats, the Liberal Democrats four, Tories are in second-last place with two seats and Labour have one.
Opposition parties are expected to see their number of seats increase dramatically once the regional list results are finalised.
But the SNP are still on course for a record fourth term in Holyrood after winning target seats of Edinburgh central, Ayr and East Lothian from Labour and the Tories.
@bbcnews: Tories ‘cock-a-hoop’ on 36% in English elections. SNP ‘likely to form next government’ all they can muster for 47% after 14 years in government, an historic fourth term, and all-time record vote tally.
— Peter Murrell (@PeterMurrell) May 7, 2021
Sturgeon said that the SNP "appears to be on course for a fourth consecutive election victory and to be on course to have the privilege of forming a government again".
READ MORE: BBC under fire for cutting off election coverage with results still to be called
It comes as Beth Rigby, the Sky News political editor, was widely criticised for saying if there is not an outright SNP majority then independence cannot go ahead.
She tweeted: "There will still be a pro-independence majority (SNP + Green) but will come as huge relief for UK govt if SNP miss outright majority - politically helps efforts to argue against second independence referendum."
This is fascinating. There will still be a pro-independence majority (SNP + Green) but will come as huge relief for UK govt if SNP miss outright majority - politically helps efforts to argue against second independence referendum https://t.co/AaXqstuTyV
— Beth Rigby (@BethRigby) May 7, 2021
As she arrived at the election count at the Emirates Arena in Glasgow yesterday, the First Minister said a majority was always a “long shot” given the Scottish Parliament mixed electoral first past the post and proportional representation system.
But she later told the BBC that a pro-independence majority in Holyrood of SNP and Green MSPs was, as she had previously maintained, a "significant" mandate for a second independence referendum.
She said a majority was not guaranteed and came down to a “small number of votes in a small number of seats”.
Rigby was criticised for downplaying the Green vote.
Laurie Macfarlane, the editor of media platform Open Democracy, said: "If I was a Green I’d find this belittling from London pundits infuriating. Why are Green votes less “real” than SNP votes? Both are avowedly pro-indy parties, and the Scottish electoral system is literally designed to prevent majorities."
Daibhidh Rothach said: "This is fascinating. People can vote SNP 1 Green 2 as a democratic preference and to Beth it’s like they’ve just spoiled their ballot paper."
Ben Rosher added: "It really doesn’t and journalists shouldn’t be pushing this narrative. A pro-indy majority is a pro-indy majority. What’s more, it’s in a system designed to produce coalitions. Parties teaming up to pursue common policy goals is *how the Scottish system is supposed to work*"
Adam Dalgleish agreed, saying: "It really bothers me when the MSM views the Scottish Parliament through Westminster eyes. The voting system is designed to prevent outright majorities and a pro-independence majority (whether SNP or otherwise) is a mandate for #indyref2."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel